201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10265591)
21. Moncton Hospital's QA program improves information processing.
Boucher P; Rowell Y; Grant C; Williamson S
Dimens Health Serv; 1985 Jun; 62(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 4076601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Product management spurs emphasis on medical records.
Fox LA; Tucker J
Hospitals; 1985 Mar; 59(5):92, 94. PubMed ID: 3972372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Concurrent coding provides more accurate data for outcomes and performance reports.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1997 Aug; 1(2):25-7, 17. PubMed ID: 10345330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Addressing concurrent review coding problems.
Bulatow NL
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):36-8. PubMed ID: 10287422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of DRGs--selected implications for medical record departments.
Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA; Zipkas MM
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):24-30. PubMed ID: 10309862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Hospitals to use new disease classifications.
Rusting R
Health Care Week; 1978 Oct; 2(13):3. PubMed ID: 10238779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Executive message ... accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective payment system (PPS).
Amatayakul M
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1991 Apr; 62(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 10113573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Reducing coding errors in medical records.
Tucker J
Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Nov; 3(11):156-7. PubMed ID: 10239218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The interface of health care providers, medical records, and prospective payment.
Benjamin CD
Health Care Superv; 1986 Apr; 4(3):32-44. PubMed ID: 10311469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP National Inpatient Sample.
Berthelsen CL
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):10-23. PubMed ID: 11143275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ongoing coding reviews: ways to ensure quality.
Thompson NS; Koch D
J AHIMA; 1999 Jan; 70(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10339004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quality assessment: monitoring and evaluating medical record documentation and services.
Curtis EH
Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Sep; 10(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10294810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Combatting the discharge data reliability problem.
Baird R
Med Rec News; 1979 Jun; 50(3):86-92. PubMed ID: 10242273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Computer assisted coding quality management.
Servais C
J AHIMA; 1992 Jan; 63(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 10118233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Designation of principal diagnosis and procedures.
Ashton JR; Bechert LR
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Aug; 54(8):21-2. PubMed ID: 10310136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Developing a quality management program for coded data.
Hyde LA
J AHIMA; 1992 Jan; 63(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 10118234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Attributes of healthcare productivity standards.
Kahl K; Krajnak G
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 May; 57(5):18-20. PubMed ID: 10276716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of hospital activity analysis operation codes.
Whates PD; Birzgalis AR; Irving M
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Jun; 284(6332):1857-8. PubMed ID: 6805731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Quality of medical records in the "Medical Information System Program": application of the lot quality assurance sampling method].
Laroche ML; Vergnenègre A; Druet-Cabanac M; Boutros-Toni F; Salamon R; Preux PM
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2002 Oct; 50(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 12471336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Making medical record review objective and effective.
Smith CJ
Med Rec News; 1979 Aug; 50(4):74-9. PubMed ID: 10243256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
