These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10266280)

  • 1. Market indexed compensation.
    Turnasella T
    Pers Adm; 1984 May; 29(5):27, 30-9. PubMed ID: 10266280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pay-for-performance.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1990 Apr; 6(8):4-7. PubMed ID: 10104227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pay raises: merit or seniority?
    Umiker WO
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 Sep; 15(9):63-8. PubMed ID: 10262432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current methods, problems and future trends. The merit of merit pay.
    Printz RA; Waldman DA
    Pers Adm; 1985 Jan; 30(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 10269516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wrestling with pay equity? Design your own merit pay delivery system.
    Brinks JT
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):108, 110, 112. PubMed ID: 10250322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pay increase guidelines with merit.
    Doyel HW; Johnson JL
    Pers J; 1985 Jun; 64(6):46, 49-50. PubMed ID: 10271646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating salary increases.
    Axelrod CW
    Pers J; 1978 Dec; 57(12):676-9, 697. PubMed ID: 10239503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Merit pay: fact or fiction?
    Lawler EE
    Manage Rev; 1981 Apr; 70(4):50-3. PubMed ID: 10251505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pay for performance: accent on standards and measures.
    Rock RH
    Compens Rev; 1984; 16(3):15-25. PubMed ID: 10267686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Administrative aspects of the reorganization of forensic medicine].
    Shmidt VK; Simanovskaia GV; Pliukhin PA; Shcherbinska IV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1987; 30(4):12-5. PubMed ID: 3433311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calculating merit increases: a structured approach.
    Seithel WW; Emans JS
    Personnel; 1983; 60(5):56-68. PubMed ID: 10262948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extending the flexible spine of pay.
    Davies P
    Health Serv J; 1988 Dec; 98(5130):1442. PubMed ID: 10290747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pay-for-performance program stresses commitment, fairness.
    Fanning RR
    Hosp Manager; 1985; 15(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 10271842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking strategy, performance, and pay.
    Migliore RH
    J Bus Strategy; 1982; 3(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 10263904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resolving the merit pay dilemma demands HR involvement in compensation philosophy.
    Browdy JD
    Healthc Hum Resour; 1993 Oct; 2(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10135941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Executive incentive plans for hospitals.
    Channon B
    Top Health Care Financ; 1986; 12(4):27-38. PubMed ID: 3726865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rethink executive compensation to fit your approach to TQM.
    Browdy J
    Healthc Hum Resour; 1992 Oct; 1(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 10135782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A practical approach to performance appraisal.
    Pressler EC
    Manage World; 1978 Nov; 7(11):9-12. PubMed ID: 10239456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modest proposal for the simultaneous solution of tenure and promotion issues: a satirical essay.
    Guth L; Calia FM
    Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 2726415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. TQM initiatives demand a new look at elements of compensation.
    Healthc Hum Resour; 1992 Oct; 1(10):6. PubMed ID: 10135783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.