These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10266673)
21. Legal pitfalls in exclusive physician-hospital agreements. Ludlam JE Hosp Med Staff; 1975 Dec; 4(12):6-10. PubMed ID: 10237777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Fair basis for staff privileges can protect hospitals against restraint-of-trade charges. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1983 Apr; 64(4):84, 86. PubMed ID: 10259084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Friedman v. Delaware County Memorial Hospital: judicial protection for good-faith peer review. Dalton JF Healthspan; 1988 Jan; 5(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 10286662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The case for arbitrating hospital-physician disputes. Ladimer I Trustee; 1981 Feb; 34(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 10250426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Court upholds rational approach to granting medical staff privileges. Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1987 Mar; 68(2):14. PubMed ID: 10280966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Salaried physicians (pathologists) and due process hearings. Maressa VA J Med Soc N J; 1984 Jul; 81(7):545. PubMed ID: 6590865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. How recent court rulings are affecting staff privileges. Snyder JD; Bale C Physicians Manage; 1983 Apr; 23(4):45-7, 50. PubMed ID: 10262490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Court upholds revocation of MD's staff privileges. Speaker F Pa Med; 1980 Jul; 83(7):8-9. PubMed ID: 7393612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medical staff privileges: time for another look. Sloss PF Trustee; 1979 Feb; 32(2):8, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10240315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. NY Court refuses to review medical privileges. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1980 Aug; 61(8):72, 74. PubMed ID: 10247579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Supreme Court declines review of staff privileges, other health cases. McCann RW Health Law Vigil; 1985 Apr; 8(8):1-3. PubMed ID: 10270686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Hospital board to rule on privileges. Am Med News; 1982 Mar; 25(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 10255841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. California Supreme Court requires judicial deference to initial hospital medical staff decisions. Christensen JD; Saunders JA Health Law Vigil; 1983 Feb; 6(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10258300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Federal district court dismisses alleged antitrust and civil rights violations in Florida hospitals' denial of staff privileges. O'Brien JP Health Law Vigil; 1981 Sep; 4(19):10-1. PubMed ID: 10252310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. California High Court rules on ability to work with others as criterion for medical staff privileges: must be related to patient care. Schwartz R Health Law Vigil; 1980 Aug; 3(17):1-2. PubMed ID: 10247620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Right to set staff privileges affirmed. Horty JF Mod Healthc; 1983 Jun; 13(6):138, 140. PubMed ID: 10260332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]