409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10266801)
1. DONs share insights on personnel management.
Lawlor A
Todays Nurs Home; 1984 Jun; 5(6):1, 22, 29-31 passim. PubMed ID: 10266801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychological preparedness.
Christensen PB; Cogdell CH
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):7-18. PubMed ID: 2640604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating employee performance: contemporary trends for the administrator.
Smith HL; Elbert NF
J Am Health Care Assoc; 1979 Mar; 5(2):10-1, 13-6. PubMed ID: 10308826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nursing management. Performance ratings.
Faulconer DR
Todays OR Nurse; 1983 Oct; 5(8):40, 51. PubMed ID: 6557697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Self appraisal.
Schlossberg A
Nurs Homes; 1981; 30(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 10283804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. As resources shrink, evaluate personnel.
Raab LC
Contemp Adm Long Term Care; 1980 Dec; 3(12):16, 18. PubMed ID: 10295054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The nurse executive defendant.
Feutz SA
J Nurs Adm; 1988 Jan; 18(1):5-6, 12. PubMed ID: 3339458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A model for assessing nurse administrators' actions.
Schmieding NJ
West J Nurs Res; 1990 Jun; 12(3):293-306. PubMed ID: 2363287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Progressive discipline in nursing. Arbitrators' decisions.
Kjervik DK
J Nurs Adm; 1984 Apr; 14(4):34-7. PubMed ID: 6561247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A guide for nurse executives--assessing your organizational "fit".
Newham-Javorek J
Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):94. PubMed ID: 3368163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing productivity through performance evaluation.
Lachman VD
J Nurs Adm; 1984 Dec; 14(12):7-14. PubMed ID: 6568265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance appraisal.
Clark MD
Nurs Manage; 1982 Oct; 13(10):27-9. PubMed ID: 6924150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Managing by behavior and results--linking supervisory accountability to effective organizational control.
Johnson J; Luciano K
J Nurs Adm; 1983 Dec; 13(12):19-28. PubMed ID: 6557132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Being objective about appraisal.
McKenzie I
Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
Megel MA
Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Using workload analysis and acuity systems to facilitate quality and productivity.
Kirk R
J Nurs Adm; 1990 Mar; 20(3):21-30. PubMed ID: 2313371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variables influencing administrative evaluation of nursing deans and directors in public and private institutions.
Hodges LC; Christ MA
J Prof Nurs; 1987; 3(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 3647054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The tenure of directors of nursing.
Freund CM
J Nurs Adm; 1985 Feb; 15(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 3844446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Work evaluations: are they effective?
Loraine K
Nurs Manage; 1982 Apr; 13(4):44-6. PubMed ID: 6922444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
Martin V
Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
