BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10267505)

  • 1. Containing costs in the blood bank by reducing unnecessary crossmatching.
    Friedman BA
    Pathologist; 1984 Jul; 38(7):405-10. PubMed ID: 10267505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum surgical blood order schedule reduces hospital costs.
    Hardy NM; Bolen FH; Shatney CH
    Am Surg; 1987 Apr; 53(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 3579029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Programs educate physicians on costs, use of blood.
    Friedman E
    Hosp Med Staff; 1980 Oct; 9(10):2-9. PubMed ID: 10248674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Successful implementation of Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule.
    Lowery TA; Clark JA
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1989 Mar; 78(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 2708924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience with a cost-effective crossmatch protocol.
    Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Kent DR; Jacobs VL; Nakayama RK; Malone SA
    JAMA; 1985 Jul; 254(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 3999355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a Type and Screen program in hospital blood bank inventory control.
    Muschenheim F
    J Med Soc N J; 1982 Oct; 79(11):823-6. PubMed ID: 6960182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey of the College of American Pathologists--1978.
    Walker RH; Mullen SA; Myhre BA; Polesky HF; van der Hoeven LH; van Schoonhoven PV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Oct; 74(4 Suppl):560-4. PubMed ID: 7435448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 1983 Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey of the College of American Pathologists.
    Cooper ES; Hoeltge G; Schmidt PJ; Simon TL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Jun; 110(6):474-8. PubMed ID: 3754718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The new look in pretransfusion compatibility testing.
    Schmidt PJ
    Pathologist; 1985 Jul; 39(7):31-3. PubMed ID: 10272024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximizing the benefits of type and screen by continued surveillance of transfusion practice.
    Davis SP; Barrasso C; Ness PM
    Am J Med Technol; 1983 Aug; 49(8):579-82. PubMed ID: 6670674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost containment and simplification in the blood bank.
    Polesky HF
    Clin Lab Med; 1985 Dec; 5(4):793-9. PubMed ID: 4085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Type and Screen: immunohematological safety is ensured and costs are lowered].
    Riedler GF
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Nov; 126(45):1946-51. PubMed ID: 8992623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phage display tools for blood typing.
    Siegel DL
    Curr Hematol Rep; 2005 Nov; 4(6):459-64. PubMed ID: 16232383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The suitability of hemolyzed specimens for compatibility testing using automated technology.
    Laga A; Cheves T; Maroto S; Coutts M; Sweeney J
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1713-20. PubMed ID: 18482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experiences with "self service" electronic blood banking.
    Cheng G
    Vox Sang; 1998; 74 Suppl 2():427-9. PubMed ID: 9704477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incomplete pretransfusion testing leads to surgical delays.
    McWilliams B; Yazer MH; Cramer J; Triulzi DJ; Waters JH
    Transfusion; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2139-44; quiz 2145. PubMed ID: 22348700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Virtual blood banking: a 7-year experience.
    Wong KF; Kwan AM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 124(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15923176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The sustained impact of a group and screen and maximum surgical blood ordering schedule policy on the transfusion practice in gynaecology and obstetrics.
    Atrah HI; Galea G; Urbaniak SJ
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Jun; 17(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 8536422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of a data driven maximum surgical blood ordering schedule on preoperative blood ordering practices.
    Woodrum CL; Wisniewski M; Triulzi DJ; Waters JH; Alarcon LH; Yazer MH
    Hematology; 2017 Oct; 22(9):571-577. PubMed ID: 28441911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The computer or electronic crossmatch.
    Butch SH; Oberman HA
    Transfus Med Rev; 1997 Oct; 11(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 9345707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.