BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10267770)

  • 1. Staff development. Appraisals reassessed.
    Watson J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1984 Jun; 94(4901):708. PubMed ID: 10267770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing performance-appraisal systems.
    Ross SR
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Aug; 41(8):1567-73. PubMed ID: 6475976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance appraisal: a positive management tool.
    Smith KE
    Coll Rev; 1984; 1(2):43-62. PubMed ID: 10268509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting the most out of performance appraisals.
    Gubman EL
    Manage Rev; 1984 Nov; 73(11):44-8. PubMed ID: 10269466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How accurate are performance appraisals?
    Winstanley NB
    Pers Adm; 1980 Aug; 25(8):55-8. PubMed ID: 10248160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health care manager's notebook: performance appraisals.
    Hengesbach J; Buschmohle MJ
    Hosp Forum; 1981; 24(6):45-8. PubMed ID: 10253069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using results to rate performance.
    English JW; Gottesman JI
    Health Serv Manager; 1980 Oct; 13(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 10248518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telling subordinates what to do and how to do it.
    English JW; Gottesman JI
    Superv Manage; 1979 Jul; 24(7):21-4. PubMed ID: 10242789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Employee performance appraisal presents unique opportunities.
    Harris JG
    Tex Hosp; 1985 Nov; 41(6):22-3. PubMed ID: 10275243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance appraisal for the '80s.
    Brush DH; Schoenfeldt LF
    Pers Adm; 1982 Dec; 27(12):76-83. PubMed ID: 10260398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing a usable performance appraisal system.
    Brief AP
    J Nurs Adm; 1979 Oct; 9(10):7-10. PubMed ID: 258663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidelines for effective and defensible performance appraisal systems.
    Wells RG
    Pers J; 1982 Oct; 61(10):776-82. PubMed ID: 10258015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing performance standards for personnel performance.
    Halterman CA
    Quintessence Dent Technol; 1981 Apr; 5(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 6941338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ten myths about criterion reference performance appraisal.
    Berger L; Clipp FP
    South Hosp; 1982; 50(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 10257273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An appraisal system that yields results.
    Blai B
    Superv Manage; 1983 Nov; 28(11):39-42. PubMed ID: 10263109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appraising the performance of performance appraisal.
    Brinkerhoff DW; Kanter RM
    Sloan Manage Rev; 1980; 21(3):3-16. PubMed ID: 10249849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance appraisal, 1: Risks and rewards.
    Romberg RV
    Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):20-6. PubMed ID: 10278732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance review guidelines revisited.
    Zielski K
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):76-7. PubMed ID: 10315281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MJS: management by job standards.
    Hoffman RR
    Pers J; 1979 Aug; 58(8):536-40, 555. PubMed ID: 10243304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.