These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10267770)

  • 21. Reviewing performance appraisal policies can lead to improved worker health.
    Rosen RH
    Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):54. PubMed ID: 10267658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance appraisal, 2: Improving the rater's effectiveness.
    Martin DC
    Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):28-33. PubMed ID: 10278733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance appraisal: can we 'manage' away the curse?
    Lee C
    Radiol Manage; 1997; 19(2):46-54. PubMed ID: 10166747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Managing the performance evaluation system: a case study.
    Tanner S; Greene L
    Health Care Superv; 1986 Jan; 4(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 10274986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changing management positions.
    Seville CM
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 10272344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developing criteria for promotion and tenure.
    Garrity M; Miller V; Osborn M; Vanderlinden M
    Nurs Outlook; 1980 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 6899063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Community health nurses. An evaluation test].
    Wiacek M
    Pieleg Polozna; 1985; (1):9-10. PubMed ID: 3846303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Personnel evaluation in nursing].
    Sotomayor A
    Bol Col Prof Enferm P R; 1983 Jun; 9(34):9-13. PubMed ID: 6590066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Evaluation of the work of the teacher].
    Frolov SS
    Voen Med Zh; 1988 Aug; (8):19-22. PubMed ID: 3195089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Field worker's forum.
    Ross WF
    Lepr Rev; 1980 Mar; 51(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7464421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance standards for the transfusion service.
    Bachert LB
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1987 Nov; 19(11):33-9. PubMed ID: 10287246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rx for medical control.
    Latessa EM
    JEMS; 1984 Apr; 9(4):39-41. PubMed ID: 10265868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A checklist for evaluating administrators.
    Hosp Trustee; 1978; 2(5):5-8. PubMed ID: 10239699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Standards of performance in central service. A key to a quality assurance program.
    Martin NS
    Hosp Top; 1984; 62(5):34-43. PubMed ID: 10267865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Management tools for the modern day health administrator. Part 5. Setting standards and motivating tools.
    Snook ID; Zimmerman GM
    Hosp Top; 1984; 62(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 10264678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance appraisal: the legal implications of Title VII.
    Lubben GL; Thompson DE; Klasson CR
    Personnel; 1980; 57(3):11-21. PubMed ID: 10247390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance appraisals.
    Kasper JE
    J Hosp Supply Process Distrib; 1985; 3(3):73-4. PubMed ID: 10271542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CEO evaluation practices.
    Petro P
    Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1985 Mar; 29(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 10272004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Appraisal schemes could do better.
    Watson J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1983 Oct; 93(4870):1288-9. PubMed ID: 10263806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Failed criteria: a verdict on the job evaluation document.
    Jacob D
    Nurs Times; 1977 Oct; 73(41):1579. PubMed ID: 928090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.