These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10267820)
21. Marketplace. New York's small business plan: waive mandates, help with claims. Moskowitz DB Med Health; 2000 Dec; 54(48):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 11139904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Regulating the cost of institutional healthcare through competitive bidding. Hogan AJ Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 10269751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. AZ hospitals tussling with coalition over cost cutting legislative proposals. Cain C Mod Healthc; 1983 Jul; 13(7):66. PubMed ID: 10310090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Maryland Court of Appeals upholds state rate-setting agency action in favor of hospitals. Kinney ED Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(7):8-9. PubMed ID: 10265241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. N.Y. hospitals: let's regulate. Many lament deregulation of mid-1990s. Becker C Mod Healthc; 2003 Jun; 33(23):7, 16. PubMed ID: 12827817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Arizona hospital cost battle goes to the polls; voters to decide rate control issue. Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(5):37-8. PubMed ID: 10270111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. U.S. District Court finds for West Virginia hospitals in challenge to new West Virginia rate-setting statute. Kinney E Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jan; 7(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 10264311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Battle brewing over health care in Arizona. Haggerty AG Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1984 Feb; 88(5):4. PubMed ID: 10265473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Arizona employers leading health cost battle. Cain C Bus Insur; 1983 May; 17(22):24, 26. PubMed ID: 10260679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Arizona health care confrontation. Hirsch RS Internist; 1985 Feb; 26(2):15-6. PubMed ID: 10270281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Health planning and certificate of need: the quality dimension. Hershey N; Robinson D Health Policy Q; 1981; 1(4):243-68. PubMed ID: 10315157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Mandatory rate setting still studied by states. Cain C Bus Insur; 1984 Dec 24-31; 18(52):16, 18. PubMed ID: 10269297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Arizona: what happened and why. Part 2. Flower J Hosp Forum; 1985; 28(3):75, 78, 80. PubMed ID: 10272327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Federal, state courts uphold challenges to rate-setting systems. Trilling H Bus Health; 1985 Apr; 2(5):51. PubMed ID: 10270557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. State-HSA relations: Washington health systems agencies and state hospital commission. MacStravic RE; McEvoy SA J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1981; 4(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 10278101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The great Arizona shoot-out: Part Two. Riggs L Healthmarketing; 1985; 4(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 10272210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Eugene Provost. Interview by Carolyn Forcina. Provost E N J Healthc; 1988; 1(5):7-9, 15. PubMed ID: 10304315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Radical proposals on health-care costs...and the methods' limiting repercussions. Stacey J Am Med News; 1981 May; 24(20):9-11. PubMed ID: 10298175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Rate review is a good alternative to Medicaid funds cap: witnesses. Simler SL Mod Healthc; 1981 Jul; 11(7):26. PubMed ID: 10298210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]