515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10268450)
1. Antitrust, joint ventures and the end of the AMA's contract practice ethics: new ways of thinking about the health care industry.
Weller CD
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Oct; 6(8):7-36. PubMed ID: 10268450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. High court relaxes exclusive-contract antitrust rules in Hyde.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hospitals; 1984 Jun; 58(11):74-9. PubMed ID: 6724551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Exclusive contract case sets important antitrust precedent, considerations.
Halper HR
Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):52-3. PubMed ID: 10267657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Exclusive contracts under antitrust attack.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hosp Med Staff; 1982 Nov; 11(11):2-9. PubMed ID: 10257181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antitrust implications of allied health practitioner privilege decisions and hospital-physician exclusive contracts.
Miles JJ
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10289814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reviewing hospital-physician contracts: reading between the lines.
Vinson RK; O'Connor MK
Healthspan; 1990 Mar; 7(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10104393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Exclusive contracts and hospital privileges--the physician's perspective.
Chenen AR
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10285826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract in Hyde antitrust decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 May; 13(5):2-9. PubMed ID: 10266239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital law: the spiraling cost of litigation.
Hollowell EE
South Hosp; 1984; 52(5):66-7. PubMed ID: 10268456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospitals should enter exclusive contracts for the right reasons.
Holthaus D
Trustee; 1989 May; 42(5):17. PubMed ID: 10293083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Anti-trust law and exclusive services contracts.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1984 Jun; 40(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 10278254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hospital not unfair to MD: U.S. court.
Nelson S
Hospitals; 1987 Aug; 61(16):60. PubMed ID: 3610107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Law-medicine notes. Exclusive hospital-medical service arrangements for anesthesiology: antitrust consequences.
Curran WJ
N Engl J Med; 1984 Jul; 311(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 6738618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Do exclusive hospital contracts constitute antitrust?
Albertson D
Physicians Manage; 1984 Mar; 24(3):61, 64-5. PubMed ID: 10278235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The U.S. Supreme Court looks at hospital-physician relationships: the Hyde decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1984; 29(3):36-49. PubMed ID: 10266558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comment: broad antitrust exemption granted to California local hospital districts.
Christensen JD
J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Jun; 21(6):140-1. PubMed ID: 10287913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Antitrust developments. Hospital exclusive contracts and the Department of Justice vertical restraints guidelines.
Miles JJ
Health Law Vigil; 1985 Mar; 8(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 10270265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Coastal Neuro-Psychiatric broadens state action exemption protection for hospital credentialing decisions.
Lipsetts PG
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):9-11. PubMed ID: 10278410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Antitrust law implications of exclusive contracts, closed staffs, and denials of hospital privileges.
Costilo LB
Ann Intern Med; 1982 Oct; 97(4):599-601. PubMed ID: 7125417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supreme Court relaxes exclusive contract rules in antitrust decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Trustee; 1984 Jun; 37(6):34-8. PubMed ID: 10266797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
