These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

510 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10268450)

  • 1. Antitrust, joint ventures and the end of the AMA's contract practice ethics: new ways of thinking about the health care industry.
    Weller CD
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Oct; 6(8):7-36. PubMed ID: 10268450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High court relaxes exclusive-contract antitrust rules in Hyde.
    Reed TJ; Allen HS
    Hospitals; 1984 Jun; 58(11):74-9. PubMed ID: 6724551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exclusive contract case sets important antitrust precedent, considerations.
    Halper HR
    Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):52-3. PubMed ID: 10267657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exclusive contracts under antitrust attack.
    Reed TJ; Allen HS
    Hosp Med Staff; 1982 Nov; 11(11):2-9. PubMed ID: 10257181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antitrust implications of allied health practitioner privilege decisions and hospital-physician exclusive contracts.
    Miles JJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10289814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reviewing hospital-physician contracts: reading between the lines.
    Vinson RK; O'Connor MK
    Healthspan; 1990 Mar; 7(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10104393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exclusive contracts and hospital privileges--the physician's perspective.
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10285826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract in Hyde antitrust decision.
    Reed TJ; Allen HS
    Hosp Med Staff; 1984 May; 13(5):2-9. PubMed ID: 10266239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital law: the spiraling cost of litigation.
    Hollowell EE
    South Hosp; 1984; 52(5):66-7. PubMed ID: 10268456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospitals should enter exclusive contracts for the right reasons.
    Holthaus D
    Trustee; 1989 May; 42(5):17. PubMed ID: 10293083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anti-trust law and exclusive services contracts.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1984 Jun; 40(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 10278254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital not unfair to MD: U.S. court.
    Nelson S
    Hospitals; 1987 Aug; 61(16):60. PubMed ID: 3610107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Law-medicine notes. Exclusive hospital-medical service arrangements for anesthesiology: antitrust consequences.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Jul; 311(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 6738618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do exclusive hospital contracts constitute antitrust?
    Albertson D
    Physicians Manage; 1984 Mar; 24(3):61, 64-5. PubMed ID: 10278235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The U.S. Supreme Court looks at hospital-physician relationships: the Hyde decision.
    Reed TJ; Allen HS
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1984; 29(3):36-49. PubMed ID: 10266558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment: broad antitrust exemption granted to California local hospital districts.
    Christensen JD
    J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Jun; 21(6):140-1. PubMed ID: 10287913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antitrust developments. Hospital exclusive contracts and the Department of Justice vertical restraints guidelines.
    Miles JJ
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Mar; 8(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 10270265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coastal Neuro-Psychiatric broadens state action exemption protection for hospital credentialing decisions.
    Lipsetts PG
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):9-11. PubMed ID: 10278410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antitrust law implications of exclusive contracts, closed staffs, and denials of hospital privileges.
    Costilo LB
    Ann Intern Med; 1982 Oct; 97(4):599-601. PubMed ID: 7125417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court relaxes exclusive contract rules in antitrust decision.
    Reed TJ; Allen HS
    Trustee; 1984 Jun; 37(6):34-8. PubMed ID: 10266797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.