BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10268509)

  • 1. Performance appraisal: a positive management tool.
    Smith KE
    Coll Rev; 1984; 1(2):43-62. PubMed ID: 10268509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing performance-appraisal systems.
    Ross SR
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Aug; 41(8):1567-73. PubMed ID: 6475976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluate your employees.
    Roskens RF
    Med Group Manage; 1984; 31(4):30-1, 34-5. PubMed ID: 10267450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance appraisal: can we 'manage' away the curse?
    Lee C
    Radiol Manage; 1997; 19(2):46-54. PubMed ID: 10166747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Appraising the performance of performance appraisal.
    Brinkerhoff DW; Kanter RM
    Sloan Manage Rev; 1980; 21(3):3-16. PubMed ID: 10249849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing a usable performance appraisal system.
    Brief AP
    J Nurs Adm; 1979 Oct; 9(10):7-10. PubMed ID: 258663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How accurate are performance appraisals?
    Winstanley NB
    Pers Adm; 1980 Aug; 25(8):55-8. PubMed ID: 10248160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Getting the most out of performance appraisals.
    Gubman EL
    Manage Rev; 1984 Nov; 73(11):44-8. PubMed ID: 10269466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subordinate performance appraisal: what nurses really want in their managers.
    Tayler CM
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1992; 5(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1463762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health care manager's notebook: performance appraisals.
    Hengesbach J; Buschmohle MJ
    Hosp Forum; 1981; 24(6):45-8. PubMed ID: 10253069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance appraisal: the legal implications of Title VII.
    Lubben GL; Thompson DE; Klasson CR
    Personnel; 1980; 57(3):11-21. PubMed ID: 10247390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of performance standards on productivity among medical record department employees.
    Stich EK
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Aug; 61(8):44-8. PubMed ID: 10105672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Staff development. Appraisals reassessed.
    Watson J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1984 Jun; 94(4901):708. PubMed ID: 10267770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing productivity through performance evaluation.
    Lachman VD
    J Nurs Adm; 1984 Dec; 14(12):7-14. PubMed ID: 6568265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidelines for effective and defensible performance appraisal systems.
    Wells RG
    Pers J; 1982 Oct; 61(10):776-82. PubMed ID: 10258015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple rater performance appraisals: solutions for hospital personnel.
    Boissoneau RA; Edwards MR
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):54-66. PubMed ID: 10270712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Employee performance appraisal presents unique opportunities.
    Harris JG
    Tex Hosp; 1985 Nov; 41(6):22-3. PubMed ID: 10275243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An appraisal system that yields results.
    Blai B
    Superv Manage; 1983 Nov; 28(11):39-42. PubMed ID: 10263109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance appraisal for the '80s.
    Brush DH; Schoenfeldt LF
    Pers Adm; 1982 Dec; 27(12):76-83. PubMed ID: 10260398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.