These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10268798)

  • 1. Court ruling clarifies judicial review of physician's ouster by hospital.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(14):168-70. PubMed ID: 10268798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hospital's evidence supports denial of staff privileges.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1981 Nov; 62(11):63, 65. PubMed ID: 10253087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court upholds hospital board's denial of staff privileges.
    Pickens A
    Tex Med; 1979 Jan; 75(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 425042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician's lack of knowledge prevents staff appointment.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1978 Jan; 59(1):40, 45. PubMed ID: 621051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fifth Circuit: hospitals did not violate the Sherman Act.
    Fraiche DD; Carlson WT
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(13):2-3. PubMed ID: 10277100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review after Patrick.
    Bierig J
    J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Jun; 21(6):135-9. PubMed ID: 10287912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal immunity for medical peer-review programs. New policies explored.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Jan; 320(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 2783210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician in a hospital setting.
    Zaslow J
    Leg Med; 1985; ():323-33. PubMed ID: 3869660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court upholds law's immunities in peer review cases.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1990; 71(6):21, 31. PubMed ID: 10105569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bell v. Sharp Cabrillo Hospital: defining the hospital's level of corporate responsibility.
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):69-71. PubMed ID: 10104434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. California Supreme Court requires judicial deference to initial hospital medical staff decisions.
    Christensen JD; Saunders JA
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Feb; 6(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10258300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court sets rules on physician suspensions.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Mar; 18(12):43. PubMed ID: 10286496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Judicial scrutiny prevails over decisions by hospitals' credentials committees.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1983 Feb; 64(2):80. PubMed ID: 10258284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The disruptive physician: handle with care.
    Hollowell EE
    Trustee; 1978 Jun; 31(6):11-3, 15, 17. PubMed ID: 10307838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gianetti v Norwalk Hospital: Connecticut Supreme Court rules on hospital and medical staff member contractual relationship and judicial review of medical staff termination decisions.
    Ronai SE; Hyman PE
    Conn Med; 1989 Jul; 53(7):425-6. PubMed ID: 2758833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Due process. Part 1: the physician's right to due process and equal protection.
    Southwick AF
    Hosp Med Staff; 1978 May; 7(5):30-7 concl. PubMed ID: 10306911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Piercing the doctrine of corporate hospital liability.
    Cohoon JB
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1981 Aug; 3(6):5-23. PubMed ID: 10295123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital medical staff bylaws: an Indiana model.
    Holden RW; Manning GC; Strycker DL; Dyer RL; Gentile JP; Christian JE
    Indiana Med; 1987 Jan; 80(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 3819374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court decides Patrick; peer review alive and well despite ruling.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(13):1-5. PubMed ID: 10287418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.