These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10269331)

  • 1. A comparison of knowledge, synthesis, and clinical judgment. Multiple-choice questions in the assessment of physician competence.
    Norcini JJ; Swanson DB; Grosso LJ; Shea JA; Webster GD
    Eval Health Prof; 1984 Dec; 7(4):485-99. PubMed ID: 10269331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence.
    Norcini JJ; Swanson DB; Grosso LJ; Webster GD
    Med Educ; 1985 May; 19(3):238-47. PubMed ID: 4010571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing a script concordance examination to a multiple-choice examination on a core internal medicine clerkship.
    Kelly W; Durning S; Denton G
    Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22775780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relevance to clinical practice of the certifying examination in internal medicine.
    Norcini JJ; Day SC; Grosso LJ; Langdon LO; Kimball HR; Popp RL; Goldfinger SE
    J Gen Intern Med; 1993 Feb; 8(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 8441080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The introduction of single best answer questions as a test of knowledge in the final examination for the fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists in Clinical Oncology.
    Tan LT; McAleer JJ;
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Oct; 20(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 18585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of traditional assessment with the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).
    Coovadia HM; Moosa A
    S Afr Med J; 1985 May; 67(20):810-2. PubMed ID: 3992412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of key feature cases for the self-assessment of colon and rectal surgeons.
    Trudel JL; Bordage G; Downing SM
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 18650635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The feasibility of a multi-format Web-based assessment of physicians' communication skills.
    Kim S; Brock DM; Hess BJ; Holmboe ES; Gallagher TH; Lipner RS; Mazor KM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Sep; 84(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 21550197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients don't present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians' competence.
    Veloski JJ; Rabinowitz HK; Robeson MR; Young PR
    Acad Med; 1999 May; 74(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 10353288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: an evaluative study of assessment methods.
    Auewarakul C; Downing SM; Jaturatamrong U; Praditsuwan R
    Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 39(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 15733163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Enhancement-focused framework for developing high quality single best answer multiple choice questions.
    AlMahmoud T; Elzubeir MA; Shaban S; Branicki F
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 26996644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.
    McConnell MM; St-Onge C; Young ME
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 24973998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical competence in internal medicine.
    Ann Intern Med; 1979 Mar; 90(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 426410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Transposition of an American-designed comprehensive medical student examination within the framework of the forthcoming French nationwide comprehensive examination. A preliminary study].
    Fournier JP; De Champlain AF; Benchimol D; Staccini P; Subhiyah R; Braun M; Kohler C; Guidet B; Claudepierre P; Prevel M; Scoles P; Holtzman K; Swanson D; Angelucci K; McGrenra C; Goldberg J; Rampal P; Melnick D
    Ann Med Interne (Paris); 2003 May; 154(3):148-56. PubMed ID: 12910041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
    Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
    Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MCQs in general internal medicine.
    Lehner P
    Br J Hosp Med; 1990 Jun; 43(6):464-5. PubMed ID: 2364240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pearls and pitfalls of setting high-quality multiple choice questions for clinical medicine.
    Naidoo M
    S Afr Fam Pract (2004); 2023 May; 65(1):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 37265132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists.
    Ramsey PG; Carline JD; Inui TS; Larson EB; LoGerfo JP; Norcini JJ; Wenrich MD
    JAMA; 1991 Aug; 266(8):1103-7. PubMed ID: 1865543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The validity and reliability of the sixth-year internal medical examination administered at the King Abdulaziz University Medical College.
    Fallatah HI; Tekian A; Park YS; Al Shawa L
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 15():10. PubMed ID: 25638149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.