These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10269416)
1. Maricopa aftermath: what is required for a physician group to achieve integration? Stromberg RE; Goldman JS Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jan; 8(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 10269416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Antitrust and physician payment. Pollard MR N C Med J; 1984 Apr; 45(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 6585668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review of fees by physician groups: antitrust issues. Scott M Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(14):5-8. PubMed ID: 10277308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Procompetitive standards OK, lawyer assures PPRC. Pollner F Med World News; 1989 Feb; 30(3):55. PubMed ID: 10294486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An antitrust primer for physicians. Anders GT; Beck LC; Bak BB; Gallagher JW Conn Med; 1985 Feb; 49(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 3971716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Why five soloists are suing a big group. Holoweiko M Med Econ; 1982 Jun; 59(13):74-8, 79. PubMed ID: 10255677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternative delivery systems are focus of antitrust scrutiny. Scammon DL; Fuller DA; Sheffet MJ J Health Care Mark; 1987 Jun; 7(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10282715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Arizona v. Maricopa County: a stern antitrust warning to healthcare providers. Halper HR Healthc Financ Manage; 1982 Oct; 36(10):38-42. PubMed ID: 10315212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Provider-sponsored ADSs: reducing antitrust liability after Maricopa. Walsh JH; Feller H Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 Apr; 7(2):5-25. PubMed ID: 10270877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. Supreme Court rejects case-by-case antitrust analysis in Maricopa. McCann RW Health Law Vigil; 1982 Jun; 5(13):1-4. PubMed ID: 10256005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician agreements to control medical prepayment plans: Federal Trade Commission. Adoption and publication of enforcement policy with respect to physician agreements to control medical prepayment plans. Fed Regist; 1981 Oct; 46(192):48982-92. PubMed ID: 10252959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Justice to scrutinize physician group mergers. Lutes ME Physician Exec; 1988; 14(3):24-6. PubMed ID: 10312564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Independent physicians organizations: are they a solution? Kopit WG Internist; 1987 Jul; 28(6):12-3, 16. PubMed ID: 10282657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician antitrust case settled. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1990 Mar; 20(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 10103913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Anti-trust implications of independent practice or associations. McIntire TJ Tenn Med; 2006 Jun; 99(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 16802660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital competition and antitrust: the Federal Trade Commission staff report. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jul; 10(14):6-10. PubMed ID: 10282648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Antitrust issues must be considered in buying, selling physician practices. Part 2. Lindeke JM Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1988; 21(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 10285914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Antitrust, restraint of trade, and unfair business practices. Impact on physicians. Heitler G J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):443-60. PubMed ID: 6983550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]