These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10269426)
41. DNR: an objectionable form of euthanasia. Levin DL; Levin NR Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1981 Oct; 3(8):5-17. PubMed ID: 10295163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives. Ciulla JB Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney. Hamann AA Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The 'Baby Doe' rule: is it all bad? Johnson DE; Thompson TR Pediatrics; 1984 May; 73(5):729-30. PubMed ID: 6718131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Controlled NHBD protocol for a fully conscious person: when death is intended as an end in itself and it has its own end. Spike J J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 10904894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Euthanasia. Stehbens WE N Z Med J; 1986 Mar; 99(798):190-3. PubMed ID: 3458061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The A.M.A. statement on tube feeding: an ethical analysis. O'Rourke K America (NY); 1986 Nov; 155(15):321-323,331. PubMed ID: 11658770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Where is Will Rogers when we need him most? Toward a traditional morality in biomedical ethics. Sample T Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(2):22-8. PubMed ID: 11653210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Euthanasia and the American Medical Association. Forrest DM Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Sep; 131(6):629, 631-2. PubMed ID: 6478348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Blurring distinctions between the dying and the dead: a call for discernment in organ donation. Rutecki GW Ethics Med; 1994; 10(3):60-7. PubMed ID: 11652986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The right of the dying to refuse life prolonging medical procedures: the evolving importance of state constitutions. Marks TC; Morgan RC Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1992; 18(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 11654441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Euthanasia: where are we? Where are we going? Fish MS J Med Soc N J; 1981 Nov; 78(12):812-5. PubMed ID: 6960173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Legal problems of medical practice; withholding treatment from defective newborns. Taub S Law Med Health Care; 1982 Feb; 10(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 6917002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Moral principles in withdrawing advanced life support. Pace N; Plenderleith JL; Dougall JR Br J Hosp Med; 1991 Mar; 45(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 2029597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The case for voluntary euthanasia. Moore MM UMKC Law Rev; 1974; 42(3):327-40. PubMed ID: 11661098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The right to die. Stephens J Leg Med Q; 1977 Jun; 1(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 10243224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]