BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10269516)

  • 1. Current methods, problems and future trends. The merit of merit pay.
    Printz RA; Waldman DA
    Pers Adm; 1985 Jan; 30(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 10269516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wrestling with pay equity? Design your own merit pay delivery system.
    Brinks JT
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):108, 110, 112. PubMed ID: 10250322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pay raises: merit or seniority?
    Umiker WO
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 Sep; 15(9):63-8. PubMed ID: 10262432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pay increase guidelines with merit.
    Doyel HW; Johnson JL
    Pers J; 1985 Jun; 64(6):46, 49-50. PubMed ID: 10271646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Merit pay: fact or fiction?
    Lawler EE
    Manage Rev; 1981 Apr; 70(4):50-3. PubMed ID: 10251505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pay-for-performance.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1990 Apr; 6(8):4-7. PubMed ID: 10104227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Market indexed compensation.
    Turnasella T
    Pers Adm; 1984 May; 29(5):27, 30-9. PubMed ID: 10266280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resolving the merit pay dilemma demands HR involvement in compensation philosophy.
    Browdy JD
    Healthc Hum Resour; 1993 Oct; 2(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10135941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating salary increases.
    Axelrod CW
    Pers J; 1978 Dec; 57(12):676-9, 697. PubMed ID: 10239503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pay for performance: accent on standards and measures.
    Rock RH
    Compens Rev; 1984; 16(3):15-25. PubMed ID: 10267686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extending the flexible spine of pay.
    Davies P
    Health Serv J; 1988 Dec; 98(5130):1442. PubMed ID: 10290747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compensating the red-circle employee.
    Reed PR; Kroll MJ
    Health Prog; 1985 Oct; 66(8):39-41. PubMed ID: 10274197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pay-for-performance program stresses commitment, fairness.
    Fanning RR
    Hosp Manager; 1985; 15(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 10271842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking strategy, performance, and pay.
    Migliore RH
    J Bus Strategy; 1982; 3(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 10263904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Administrative aspects of the reorganization of forensic medicine].
    Shmidt VK; Simanovskaia GV; Pliukhin PA; Shcherbinska IV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1987; 30(4):12-5. PubMed ID: 3433311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Merit increases slow but healthcare is open to innovations.
    Healthc Hum Resour; 1993 Sep; 2(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 10135965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A different approach to merit increases.
    Fleuter DL
    Pers J; 1979 Apr; 58(4):225-6, 262. PubMed ID: 10241466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skill-based pay improves PFS (patient financial services) staff recruitment, retention, and performance.
    Gustafson BM
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2000 Jan; 54(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 11067010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variable pay plans raise the bar on performance.
    Strateg Healthc Excell; 2000 Jun; 13(6):9-12. PubMed ID: 11183057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calculating merit increases: a structured approach.
    Seithel WW; Emans JS
    Personnel; 1983; 60(5):56-68. PubMed ID: 10262948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.