These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10270075)

  • 21. An 'inhouse PSRO' success story.
    Porter KW
    Trustee; 1975 Sep; 28(9):28-30. PubMed ID: 10273088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Keying review efforts to geographic variations.
    Donahue CL; O'Brien E
    Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):38, 40, 42. PubMed ID: 10317962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The buck stops with these doctors--and they like it.
    Frederick L
    Med Econ; 1985 Aug; 62(17):73-83. PubMed ID: 10272460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How to set up a focused utilization review effort.
    Payne S
    Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):32-4, 36. PubMed ID: 10312227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Group hopes to cut costs by monitoring hospital stays.
    Bus Insur; 1983 Mar; 17(11):33. PubMed ID: 10273341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fulfilling J.C.A.H. U.R. requirements.
    Lamprey J
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 May; 3(5):69-70. PubMed ID: 10289121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. U.R., audit impact of PSRO's said improving.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Dec; 3(12):163-4. PubMed ID: 10273115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. H.E.W. orders focusing out.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Aug; 3(8):109. PubMed ID: 10273069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of an HMO hospitalist program on inpatient utilization.
    Molinari C; Short R
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Nov; 7(11):1051-7. PubMed ID: 11725808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Utilization review: avoiding liability while controlling costs.
    Jespersen KR; Kendall GH
    Healthspan; 1987 Jul; 4(7):3-8. PubMed ID: 10283099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hospitals must take lead in setting up utilization review.
    Boland P
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(2):54. PubMed ID: 10291290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Milwaukee's approach to excess hospital capacity.
    Needleman J; Derzon RA
    Bus Health; 1986 Sep; 3(9):41-6. PubMed ID: 10277403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Atlanta experience. The Coalition.
    Felder LH
    Internist; 1985 Feb; 26(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 10270280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Non-delegated utilization review offers control and objectivity.
    Fine A
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Jun; ():23. PubMed ID: 10290598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Partnership paying off for small insurers.
    Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(3):43. PubMed ID: 10291655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Financial support of health care coalitions increasing.
    Young GW
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Nov; 7(24):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10269017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Utilization rates vary based on HMO ownership, finds study of comparative hospital data.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1997 Aug; 1(2):29-30, 17. PubMed ID: 10345332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Business wields its purchase power.
    Cronin C
    Bus Health; 1988 Nov; 6(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 10290528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Worcester a demonstration of health care competition.
    Bradbury R; Densmore W; Hibbard S
    Bus Health; 1984 Nov; 2(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 10268890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hospitals turn to utilization review to counter PPS's price pressures.
    Carter K
    Mod Healthc; 1987 Feb; 17(4):56, 58. PubMed ID: 10301317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.