These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10270453)
1. State regulation of polygraph tests at the workplace. Bright TL; Hollon CJ Personnel; 1985 Feb; 62(2):50-6. PubMed ID: 10270453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the polygraph provide valid information about an applicant? The polygraph: a questionable personnel tool. Belt JA Pers Adm; 1983 Aug; 28(8):65-9, 91. PubMed ID: 10263517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Labour arbitration: when somebody lies on the application. MacFarlane SJ Health Care (Don Mills); 1980 Aug; 22(8):11, 14. PubMed ID: 10248349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Polygraph in the health care industry. Tunis M J Healthc Prot Manage; 1988; 4(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10288138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Employee selection: must every job test be validated? Baker DD; Terpstra DE Pers J; 1982 Aug; 61(8):602-5. PubMed ID: 10258024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Preparing legal employment applications: state and federal laws govern content. Nathan JE; King GR Ohio Dent J; 1983 Jan; 57(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 6571977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Liability for age discrimination in the health care workplace. Stickler KB; Nelson MD J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):185-90. PubMed ID: 10288420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Workplace violence: practical advice for a problem with dire legal consequences. Lyncheski JE; Hardy WS Health Care Law Mon; 2001 May; ():17-25. PubMed ID: 11398739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection interviewing and the new uniform federal guidelines. Greenlaw PS; Kohl JP Pers Adm; 1980 Aug; 25(8):74-9. PubMed ID: 10248163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of legal challenges to personnel testing. Hinkel AL J Ment Health Adm; 1981; 8(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10252025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Employee selection based on susceptibility to occupational illness. Rothstein MA Mich Law Rev; 1983 May; 81(6):1379-496. PubMed ID: 10261890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New directions in EEO guidelines. Robertson DE Pers J; 1978 Jul; 57(7):360-3, 394. PubMed ID: 10307770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An interpretive review of the federal Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. Schanie CF; Holley WL Pers Adm; 1980 Jun; 25(6):44-8. PubMed ID: 10246978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Affirmative action for the handicapped. Steinhauser L; Vieceli L Superv Manage; 1978 Oct; 23(10):34-7. PubMed ID: 10316698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Rehab Act of 1973 says, 'Hire the handicapped;' we show you how. Bleakley WH Mod Healthc; 1980 Mar; 10(3):44-6. PubMed ID: 10316941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Title VII discrimination in biochemical testing for AIDS and marijuana. Martin AA Duke Law J; 1988 Feb; (1):129-53. PubMed ID: 10295383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]