These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10270469)
1. "Pulling the plug": are you ready to make the decision? Ginsburg WH Physicians Manage; 1985 Mar; 25(3):349-51, 354, 357-60 passim. PubMed ID: 10270469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Searching for proper judicial recognition of hospital ethics committees in decisions to forego medical treatment. Murphy CA Gold Gate Law Rev; 1990; 20(2):319-44. PubMed ID: 11651055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The lessons of Quinlan. Drane JF Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Viewing the "Draft guidelines for state court decision making in authorizing or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment" from the perspective of related areas of law and economics: a critique. Gorby JD Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):477-510. PubMed ID: 1563939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Death with dignity: is judicial involvement necessary? Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1982 May; 56(9):93-5. PubMed ID: 7061091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Law at the edge of life: issues of death and dying. Janzen PS Hamline Law Rev; 1984 Jun; 7(2):431-62. PubMed ID: 11649814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly. Baron CH J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria? Longino PH Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy. Stell LK St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective. Ackerman JW; Pope MC J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Shapiro RS Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Power of court to order or authorize discontinuation of extraordinary medical means of sustaining human life. Karnezis KC Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1977; 79():237-47. PubMed ID: 12085877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Termination of life support systems in the elderly: Legal issues: the cases of Brother Fox and Earle Spring. Annas GJ J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 7343583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment. Bolsen B Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. After Quinlan: the impact of the Saikewicz decision. Healey JM Conn Med; 1979 Jul; 43(7):455. PubMed ID: 477310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails. Curran M Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]