These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10270469)

  • 21. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
    Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care.
    Gorski SL
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.
    Lawton SE; Carder EB; Weisman AW
    J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
    Greenfield RE
    St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Foregoing nutrition and hydration.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath.
    Glantz LH; Swazey JP
    Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neonatal euthanasia: Jewish views of a contemporary dilemma.
    Jakobovits Y
    Tradition; 1986; 22(3):13-30. PubMed ID: 11651882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Quinlan decision.
    Lyons C
    Christ Crisis; 1976 May; 36(8):103-4. PubMed ID: 11661438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS; Barthel R
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life.
    Wakefield-Fisher M
    Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle?
    Byrnes JC
    Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In re D.H.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(3):403. PubMed ID: 11644339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Medical ethics in life and death.
    Thompson R
    Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The tort liability of hospital ethics committees.
    Merritt AL
    South Calif Law Rev; 1987 Jul; 60(5):1239-97. PubMed ID: 11658947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. No-code orders vs. resuscitation: the decision to withhold life-prolonging treatment from the terminally ill.
    Allan SM
    Wayne Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 26(1):139-72. PubMed ID: 11661826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
    Hyland WF; Baime DS
    Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethics committees in critical care.
    Paris JJ; Reardon FE
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 3331303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Guidelines for state court decision making in life-sustaining medical treatment cases.
    Hafemeister TL
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):443-75. PubMed ID: 1563938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns.
    Goichman G
    South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.