These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

605 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10270712)

  • 21. Staff evaluation.
    Swartz AJ
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Feb; 36(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 420206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Getting 360 degrees feedback right.
    Peiperl MA
    Harv Bus Rev; 2001 Jan; 79(1):142-7, 177. PubMed ID: 11189458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conducting effective performance appraisals.
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(5):348-52. PubMed ID: 11683150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A critique of performance appraisal systems.
    Yager E
    Pers J; 1981 Feb; 60(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10249832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Staff evaluation: an assessment of approaches.
    Calkin JD
    Health Care Superv; 1984 Jul; 2(4):68-78. PubMed ID: 10266420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Staff nurse performance. Effects of goal-setting and performance feedback.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986; 16(7-8):26-30. PubMed ID: 3637221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The design and implementation of task oriented employee evaluations.
    Hanna KJ; Sobecki DF
    Hosp Pharm; 1984 Jun; 19(6):405-8, 411-3. PubMed ID: 10266567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relevant performance appraisals.
    Buschmohle M
    Hosp Superv Bull; 1981 Sep; (422):1-4. PubMed ID: 10252802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How formal appraisal systems work.
    Pucilo NP
    Respir Ther; 1984; 14(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10265552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance appraisal: a positive management tool.
    Smith KE
    Coll Rev; 1984; 1(2):43-62. PubMed ID: 10268509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Appraisal scales that measure performance outcomes and job results.
    Plachy RJ
    Personnel; 1983; 60(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10263512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Setting up a system of pay for performance.
    Barros A
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Nov; 18(11):39-45. PubMed ID: 10281018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of results-oriented and trait-based performance appraisals.
    Murray S
    Pers Adm; 1983 Jun; 28(6):100-5. PubMed ID: 10263514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Managing employee performance.
    McConnell CR
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2004; 23(3):273-83. PubMed ID: 15457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):17, 39. PubMed ID: 3633964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nonevaluative approaches to performance appraisals.
    Wallace L
    Superv Manage; 1978 Mar; 23(3):2-9. PubMed ID: 10307327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 5 steps to a performance evaluation system.
    Capko J
    Fam Pract Manag; 2003 Mar; 10(3):43-8. PubMed ID: 12685162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Capturing supervisor rating policies: a way to improve performance appraisal effectiveness.
    Hobson CJ; Gibson FW
    Pers Adm; 1984 Mar; 29(3):59-68. PubMed ID: 10265501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Questions and answers on CRPA.
    Berger L; Clipp FP
    South Hosp; 1983; 51(1):18-9, 24. PubMed ID: 10258903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.