BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10270935)

  • 1. St. Joseph's studies computerized patient systems.
    Kuhn R
    Hosp Trustee; 1985; 9(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 10270935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of MUMPS on system development.
    Blume P
    Softw Healthc; 1985; 3(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 10278371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interconnection: a new ring for St. Joseph's.
    Toma A
    Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Aug; 60(8):29-30. PubMed ID: 6628861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computerized medical information system--sustaining benefits previously achieved.
    Blask D; Cleary J; Dux L
    Healthc Comput Commun; 1985 Dec; 2(12):60-4. PubMed ID: 10311368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoiding skepticism at St. Joseph's. St. Joseph's Hospital, Parkersburg, WV.
    Campbell S
    Profiles Healthc Mark; 1996; 12(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 10158858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted patient data system.
    Hosp Adm Can; 1975 May; 17(5):16-7, 19. PubMed ID: 10241212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Which health information systems for the evaluation of health actions?].
    Migeot V; Ingrand P; Salmi LR
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Dec; 48(6):551-60. PubMed ID: 11148427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerizing a community general hospital: a case history.
    Pogue WB
    Health Manage Forum; 1983; 4(4):46-53. PubMed ID: 10264338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. American hospitals evaluate their computer systems in 1984.
    Grams RR
    Comput Healthc; 1985 Feb; 6(2):16-20. PubMed ID: 10269627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Staff reaction to computerized admissions.
    Young Y
    Dimens Health Serv; 1977 Dec; 54(12):19-20. PubMed ID: 590643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized admissions revisited.
    Crook W
    Dimens Health Serv; 1977 Dec; 54(12):17-8. PubMed ID: 590642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Criteria for evaluating and choosing a computer system.
    Dunn MD
    Hosp Prog; 1974 May; 55(5):73-5. PubMed ID: 4827192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the alcoholism treatment program at St. Joseph's Hospital.
    Kammeier ML
    Minn Med; 1980 Sep; 63(9):649-52. PubMed ID: 7219399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital clinical computers: a Canadian experience.
    Hepburn JC
    Case Stud Health Adm; 1980; 2():138-41. PubMed ID: 10250488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of health information systems.
    Schmitz HH
    CRC Crit Rev Bioeng; 1975 Jan; 2(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 1116377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. $2 billion spent on systems, but hospitals still dissatisfied.
    Dorenfest SI
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Nov; 12(11):65-6, 68, 70. PubMed ID: 10309760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerization from the Chief of Staff's perspective.
    Granger MP
    Dimens Health Serv; 1982 May; 59(5):48-9. PubMed ID: 7075912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Networking microcomputers ... the advantages and disadvantages.
    Poggio FL
    Healthc Comput Commun; 1986 Apr; 3(4):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 10276180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information systems. The single versus multiple vendor.
    Kennedy OG
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Jan; 40(1):62. PubMed ID: 10274787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hospital computing: prognosis. Results of a joint study--ECHO, IBM, and Nolan, Norton & Company.
    Radiol Manage; 1983 Dec; 6(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 10299460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.