BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10271646)

  • 1. Pay increase guidelines with merit.
    Doyel HW; Johnson JL
    Pers J; 1985 Jun; 64(6):46, 49-50. PubMed ID: 10271646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current methods, problems and future trends. The merit of merit pay.
    Printz RA; Waldman DA
    Pers Adm; 1985 Jan; 30(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 10269516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Merit pay: fact or fiction?
    Lawler EE
    Manage Rev; 1981 Apr; 70(4):50-3. PubMed ID: 10251505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wrestling with pay equity? Design your own merit pay delivery system.
    Brinks JT
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):108, 110, 112. PubMed ID: 10250322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pay raises: merit or seniority?
    Umiker WO
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 Sep; 15(9):63-8. PubMed ID: 10262432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pay-for-performance.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1990 Apr; 6(8):4-7. PubMed ID: 10104227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Market indexed compensation.
    Turnasella T
    Pers Adm; 1984 May; 29(5):27, 30-9. PubMed ID: 10266280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating salary increases.
    Axelrod CW
    Pers J; 1978 Dec; 57(12):676-9, 697. PubMed ID: 10239503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extending the flexible spine of pay.
    Davies P
    Health Serv J; 1988 Dec; 98(5130):1442. PubMed ID: 10290747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pay-for-performance program stresses commitment, fairness.
    Fanning RR
    Hosp Manager; 1985; 15(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 10271842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linking strategy, performance, and pay.
    Migliore RH
    J Bus Strategy; 1982; 3(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 10263904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pay for performance: accent on standards and measures.
    Rock RH
    Compens Rev; 1984; 16(3):15-25. PubMed ID: 10267686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compensating the red-circle employee.
    Reed PR; Kroll MJ
    Health Prog; 1985 Oct; 66(8):39-41. PubMed ID: 10274197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Administrative aspects of the reorganization of forensic medicine].
    Shmidt VK; Simanovskaia GV; Pliukhin PA; Shcherbinska IV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1987; 30(4):12-5. PubMed ID: 3433311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculating merit increases: a structured approach.
    Seithel WW; Emans JS
    Personnel; 1983; 60(5):56-68. PubMed ID: 10262948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resolving the merit pay dilemma demands HR involvement in compensation philosophy.
    Browdy JD
    Healthc Hum Resour; 1993 Oct; 2(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10135941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Executive incentive plans for hospitals.
    Channon B
    Top Health Care Financ; 1986; 12(4):27-38. PubMed ID: 3726865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allocating your merit increases the SMART way.
    Miller RT; Campbell JL; Sherman TL
    J Nurs Adm; 1983 Mar; 13(3):32-5. PubMed ID: 6550076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A practical approach to performance appraisal.
    Pressler EC
    Manage World; 1978 Nov; 7(11):9-12. PubMed ID: 10239456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A modest proposal for the simultaneous solution of tenure and promotion issues: a satirical essay.
    Guth L; Calia FM
    Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 2726415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.