BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10271647)

  • 1. Performance appraisals that fit.
    Oliver JE
    Pers J; 1985 Jun; 64(6):66-71. PubMed ID: 10271647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Educators in action: evaluating performance.
    Hollander EC
    Tex Hosp; 1979 Jul; 35(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 10243343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A productivity triangle: three steps to good employee performance.
    Ryder JD
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 10272338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing a performance appraisal system.
    Grose LG
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 2640601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Participative employee evaluation.
    Breeden SA
    J Nurs Adm; 1978 May; 8(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 246911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The position analysis: single source for multiple applications.
    McConnell CR
    Health Care Superv; 1988 Jul; 6(4):72-84. PubMed ID: 10288360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonevaluative approaches to performance appraisals.
    Wallace L
    Superv Manage; 1978 Mar; 23(3):2-9. PubMed ID: 10307327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The management clinic: conducting performance appraisals.
    Brown R; Slattery S
    Dimens Health Serv; 1982 Feb; 59(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 7067937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The evaluation-notation].
    Mizrahi MR
    Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing and implementing a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale System: the Brook Lane Psychiatric Center experience.
    Kolva CO
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2640602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance appraisals: beware the numbers game.
    Umiker WO
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 Dec; 15(12):79-80, 85-6. PubMed ID: 10264018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance appraisals: a feasible and unbiased approach.
    Wittmayer C
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Jun; 3(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 10252077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance appraisals can improve efficiency.
    Korneluk G
    Can Doct; 1982 Sep; 48(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 10257835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What we need to know about performance appraisals.
    Danzig SM
    Manage Rev; 1980 Feb; 69(2):20-4. PubMed ID: 10247311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The design and implementation of task oriented employee evaluations.
    Hanna KJ; Sobecki DF
    Hosp Pharm; 1984 Jun; 19(6):405-8, 411-3. PubMed ID: 10266567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relevant performance appraisals.
    Buschmohle M
    Hosp Superv Bull; 1981 Sep; (422):1-4. PubMed ID: 10252802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance appraisals: much more than a once-a-year task.
    Caruth D; Middlebrook B; Rachel F
    Superv Manage; 1982 Sep; 27(9):28-36. PubMed ID: 10258965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appraisal scales that measure performance outcomes and job results.
    Plachy RJ
    Personnel; 1983; 60(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10263512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.