These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 10292421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Medical staff antitrust decisions examine defenses available to defendants. Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Jun; 7(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 10104849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The physician and hospital privileges. Hirsch HL Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():179-91. PubMed ID: 10287959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Oregon responds to physicians' fears of peer review. Koska MT Hospitals; 1990 Jan; 64(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 2294040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Peer review: Patrick redux. Cohen HH Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 10104770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply? Meghrigian AG Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How to stop a wayward doctor without getting burned. Holoweiko M Med Econ; 1989 Nov; 66(23):184-8, 191-2, 194 passim. PubMed ID: 10296180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Legal aspects of peer review. Patrick v Burget in the U.S. Supreme Court: its impact on peer review. Couch JB Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 May; 3(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 2980931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Federal court limits federal antitrust jurisdiction over medical staff decisions. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jan; 7(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 10264312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Antitrust law and medical staff decisions: can a hospital conspire with its medical staff? Reed ME; Polk DJ Bull Am Coll Surg; 1984 Apr; 69(4):22-4. PubMed ID: 10265679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]