These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10272361)
1. Ohio court upholds merger, finds bidding plan illegal. Baker C Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jun; 8(12):5-7. PubMed ID: 10272361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Competitive bidding: they're singing the blues in Cleveland. Onusko TJ Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Feb; 40(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 10275007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal challenges test relationships between Ohio hospitals, Blues plans. Richman D Mod Healthc; 1986 Jul; 16(14):74. PubMed ID: 10277194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court upholds Blues' fee discounts. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1989 Sep; 19(35):3. PubMed ID: 10324683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimizing antitrust risks of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans. Steele CJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():227-72. PubMed ID: 10288422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Providers must scrutinize contracts, bargain to eliminate unfavorable terms. Hickey K; O'Gara N Mod Healthc; 1986 Mar; 16(7):151-2. PubMed ID: 10275673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. St. Francis Hospital takes on the Blues. Haradine J Mich Hosp; 1978 Mar; 14(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 10306418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Recoupment: fear, confusion, and a court date. Jones DB Tex Med; 1987 Dec; 83(12):47-9. PubMed ID: 3321522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plan contracts with providers: cost containment objectives amid conflicting legislative schemes. Heitler G; Ader M J Leg Med; 1981 Sep; 2(3):265-96. PubMed ID: 6976401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertical restraints among hospitals, physicians and health insurers that raise rivals' costs. A case study of Reazin v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. and Ocean State Physicians Health Plan, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Rhode Island. Baker JB Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(2-3):147-69. PubMed ID: 3245541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Michigan law treats Blues plan like public agency, not private institution. LaViolette S Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10250327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases. Halper HR; Kazon PM Bus Health; 1987 Mar; 4(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10280673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Va. report: drop special rules for Blues. Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1978 Nov; 82(44):2, 26. PubMed ID: 10238875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Michigan freedom of information act apply to "Blue" data? Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Nov; 32(5):44. PubMed ID: 10304866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Some aspects of PA 350 will affect physician practice. Ford MA; Zannoth D Mich Med; 1986 Mar; 85(3):104, 114. PubMed ID: 3959918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Court upholds hospitals' suit against Blue Cross. Am Med News; 1979 Jul; 22(27):8. PubMed ID: 10242755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Insurance Bureau, the Blues and the prospective reimbursement system. Cohn A Mich Hosp; 1978 Aug; 14(8):8-11. PubMed ID: 10308444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenge to Blues' tax-exemption seen as signal to healthcare industry. Anderson HJ; Baldwin MF Mod Healthc; 1985 Dec; 15(25):18-20. PubMed ID: 10274654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HB 4555 had center stage in state's medical legislation this year. Maldonado WE Mich Med; 1980 Aug; 79(23):408-9. PubMed ID: 7402095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]