141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10272468)
1. Hospitals that impose consultation requirements must monitor situation.
Horty J
Mod Healthc; 1985 May; 15(11):118. PubMed ID: 10272468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Professional misconduct.
N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1125):51-2. PubMed ID: 11277488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorado medical staff has no standing for judicial review of trustees' decision.
Eder JR
Health Matrix; 1986; 4(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 10279347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The new malpractice minefield: "unnecessary" surgery.
Rosenberg CL
Med Econ; 1978 Jun; 55(13):27, 29-30, 32 passim. PubMed ID: 10307697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital liability for failure to monitor competence of its staff--part I.
Gargaro WJ
Cancer Nurs; 1983 Oct; 6(5):387-8. PubMed ID: 6559630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospitals' direct liability for medical malpractice--implications for the medical staff.
Peters JD; Olkowski SE
Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 10291135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Family feud.
Prather E
Tex Med; 2005 Dec; 101(12):37-9. PubMed ID: 17094499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How can hospital-physician liability in medical malpractice cases be apportioned by agreement with plaintiffs?
Gordon PA
Hosp Forum; 1976 Sep; 19(4):30, 28. PubMed ID: 10242080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Have doctor-pickets the right to direct patients elsewhere?
Med World News; 1979 Oct; 20(20):45. PubMed ID: 10243635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When do hospital perks become indictable bribes?
Pincus CR
Med Econ; 1989 May; 66(9):23-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10292632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The authorization of hospital physicians on referrals by established colleagues. The judgement of the State Higher Social Court of Rheinland-Pfalz of 19 December 1991].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1992 Oct; 117(44):1690-2. PubMed ID: 1425275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Malpractice risks of documentation.
Battista ME
Physicians Manage; 1985 Feb; 25(2):232-4, 238-9, 242 passim. PubMed ID: 10269895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The division of labor in medicine].
Bauer G
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1986 May; 136(9):193-201. PubMed ID: 3739356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Do medical consultations share in liquidation proceeds of the chief physician--decision of the Lower Saxony Medical Profession Court 17 November 2004--BG 17/02].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Jun; 130(24):1516-7. PubMed ID: 15942843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Are hospitals liable for actions of physicians?
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1988; 44(6):35. PubMed ID: 10291063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Corporate liability: hospitals, medical staffs.
Rowand RS
Health Manage Forum; 1986; 7(4):43-55. PubMed ID: 10279753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementing medical staff malpractice insurance requirements.
Nodzenski TJ
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1989; 34(2):281-92. PubMed ID: 10293281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [In search of mistakes: extent and constraints of hospital medicine].
Dorsner-Dolivet A; Scémama A
Nouv Presse Med; 1980 Mar; 9(10):721-3. PubMed ID: 7375357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Allrid v. Emory University: applying Georgia's medical malpractice statute of limitations in a difficult case.
Goodman M
J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Aug; 71(8):573-5. PubMed ID: 7130872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Medical responsibility--deciding competence in daily medical practice].
Mann H; Schimming I
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1986; 80(21):911-2. PubMed ID: 3564556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
