These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10272616)

  • 1. The practical use of test films for x-ray film processor quality control.
    Rowley RV
    Can J Radiogr Radiother Nucl Med; 1985 Aug; 16(3):123-5. PubMed ID: 10272616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Assessment of the quality of radiographic medical films and chemicals for photochemical treatment].
    Larionov VN; Leont'ev VG; Kalashnikova LN
    Med Tekh; 2001; (6):31-4. PubMed ID: 11837193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of reject x-ray films as a quality assurance element in diagnostic radiology].
    Lewentat G; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 9198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Assuring image quality in roentgen diagnostic services--information on DIN 6868. Part 2. Film processing: evaluating the uniformity of visual optic density].
    Becker-Gaab C; Borcke E; Bunde E; Hagemann G; Kütterer G; Lang GR; Schöfer H; Stender HS; Stieve FE; von Volkmann T
    Rontgenpraxis; 1987 Feb; 40(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3576371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Results of a program of quality control in radiodiagnosis].
    Belletti S; Catolla Cavalcanti R; Gallini R; Giugni U
    Radiol Med; 1983 Apr; 69(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 6856887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic and fluoroscopic QC.
    Schubert R
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 66(3):197-8. PubMed ID: 7708922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processor quality control in laser imaging systems.
    Bogucki TM; Murphy WR; Baker CW; Piazza SS; Haus AG
    Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):581-4. PubMed ID: 9127311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The use of a test phantom in step-shaped forms (test steps) for the clarification of different problem situations in x-ray diagnosis. 1. The use of test steps for the estimation of image quality after modified darkroom technics].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1990 Mar; 103(3):92-4. PubMed ID: 2317188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography].
    Gorelik FG
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance in repeat films.
    Curtis DJ; Jones RL
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1981; 14(4):281-320. PubMed ID: 7261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regular processor control improves portal film quality.
    Kihlén B
    Radiol Technol; 1992; 63(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 1557499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Economic evaluation of computed radiography comparing to film method in quality control of general X-ray machine at Phramongkutklao Hospital.
    Saengruang-Orn S; Vimolket T; Mongkolsuk M; Lertmaharit S; Tanapat Y; Noola B; Thungsiri K; Kamolratanakul P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Feb; 92 Suppl 1():S74-83. PubMed ID: 21299180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practical hints to quality dental radiography.
    Winstanley TD
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1994 Sep; 49(9):464-8. PubMed ID: 9508981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic versus film imaging: cost and quality considerations.
    Vizy KN
    Radiol Manage; 1986; 8(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 10279921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A constancy test for quality assurance of x-ray film including film processing].
    Eder H; Schöfer H
    Rontgenpraxis; 1985 Jan; 38(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 3975787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.