202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10273053)
1. A legal analysis of definitions of fetal status.
Capron AM
Clin Res; 1975 Oct; 23(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 10273053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications.
Reback GL
Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal experimentation: protocols, propriety and parameters.
Meechan CM
Queens Law J; 1985; 11(1):166-97. PubMed ID: 11659023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal experimentation: rights of the father and questions of personhood.
Wilson JP
Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):403-17. PubMed ID: 11664801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The status of the fetus.
Wasserstrom R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):18-22. PubMed ID: 1150411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Semantic problems of fetal resarch.
Pilon JG
Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):89-95. PubMed ID: 11663655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal politics: the debate on experimenting with the unborn.
Gaylin W; Lappé M
Atl Mon; 1975 May; 235(5):66-71. PubMed ID: 11663535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetics Research Group Conference. Fetal experimentation: trying to sort out the issues.
Powledge TM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Apr; 5(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 1123299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal rights? It depends.
Doudera AE
Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):38-44, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11649512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal research, morality, & public policy.
McCormick RA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):26-31. PubMed ID: 1150415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal research and antiabortion politics: holding science hostage.
Hart DS
Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(2):72-82. PubMed ID: 1092558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical issues in fetal research.
Prescott JW
Humanist; 1975; 35(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 11664439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
Wilson JP
Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Personhood: current legal views.
Larson EJ
Second Opin; 1990 Jul; 14():41-53. PubMed ID: 11650425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A bias for life: abortion does not justify harmful research.
Siegel S
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):109-17. PubMed ID: 11663564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
Buckley M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases.
Klasing MS
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The fetus as guinea pig.
Scarf M
N Y Times Mag; 1975 p 13+; 19 Oct 1975():. PubMed ID: 11664465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
