209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10273071)
1. PSROs: implications for legal liability.
Springer EW
Hosp Med Staff; 1975 Jan; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10273071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. HCFA requires hospitals to furnish PSROs with copies of patient records; AHA demands withdrawal of provision.
Health Law Vigil; 1980 Mar; 3(6):2-3. PubMed ID: 10273195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. PRO release of medical information. Implications for Missouri physicians and hospitals.
Akhter MN
Mo Med; 1985 Nov; 82(11):695-7. PubMed ID: 4069102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health care law.
Mayo TW
SMU Law Rev; 2003; 56(3):1767-82. PubMed ID: 12924424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PSROs: a magical medical mystery tour.
Bogue T
Health Law Proj Libr Bull; 1979 Jun; 4(6):180-5. PubMed ID: 10273181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Federal regulations and MRPs.
Waterstraat MJ
Med Rec News; 1975 Dec; 46(6):12-7. PubMed ID: 10273085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DC Circuit rules PSROs not government agencies under Freedom of Information Act.
Askwith JA; Kemezys KP
Health Law Vigil; 1981 Oct; 4(22):2-4. PubMed ID: 10273280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Professional Standards Review Organizations and confidentiality: the question of public access to medical peer review data through the Freedom of Information Act.
Hastings DA
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1981; 6(1):136-58. PubMed ID: 7196423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PSROs don't have to reveal records, court rules, but the matter isn't resolved.
Med World News; 1982 Jan; 23(1):72. PubMed ID: 10273293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute.
Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB
Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Suit surfaces questions on status of PSROs.
Blum JD
Hosp Med Staff; 1979 Jan; 8(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 10273120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nader group sues on PSRO records.
Holcomb B
Health Care Week; 1978 Feb; 1(30):1, 22. PubMed ID: 10306305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bivens actions not allowed against peer review organizations.
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1994 Feb; 11(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 10132989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Statutory protection for peer review committees--can it be waived?
Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1988 Jul; 77(7):586-7. PubMed ID: 3171431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. This doctor proved that PROs can be sued successfully.
Schutte JE
Med Econ; 1990 Mar; 67(5):42-7. PubMed ID: 10106425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Illinois Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of state peer review act.
Peterson RN
Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):3-4. PubMed ID: 10273522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Civil rights related responsibility of the executive physician].
Heberer J
Zentralbl Chir; 2014 Aug; 139(4):369-70. PubMed ID: 25259385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Negotiating the memorandum of understanding for delegated PSRO review.
Rossman C
Mich Hosp; 1979 Aug; 15(8):8-10. PubMed ID: 10273167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PSROs: waiver liability, confidentiality -- and new developments. Part III.
Weissburg C; Waxman JM
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(2):51, 53-5. PubMed ID: 10273243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal advice needed as hospitals negotiate with PSROs.
Newmark G
Hospitals; 1975 Jul; 49(14):24. PubMed ID: 1100510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
