These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10273115)

  • 41. PSRO's: please start reviewing ourselves.
    Waldman HB
    Ann Dent; 1975; 34(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 1056182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Smits sees U.R. coordinator important.
    Smits H
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 May; 3(5):58-9. PubMed ID: 10239219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The data game: challenges to the PSRO program.
    Glass HS
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Oct; 4(10):24-6. PubMed ID: 104223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Peer review organizations: implications for discharge planning.
    Granitir T
    Disch Plann Update; 1985; 5(3):4-10. PubMed ID: 10273644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Priorities in utilization review.
    Jones B
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Apr; 3(4):50-1. PubMed ID: 10307590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A retrospective and concurrent medical audit.
    Knowlton HC
    Hosp Prog; 1975 Jun; 56(6):68, 73, 76 passim. PubMed ID: 1168621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. PSRO's funding cut off.
    Am Med News; 1979 Apr; 22(16):1, 13. PubMed ID: 10277939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Who's in charge of utilization review?
    Ankrum AD
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 May; 3(5):60-1. PubMed ID: 10273108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Designation of alternate PSRO's: final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Sep; 43(190 Pt 1):44848-50. PubMed ID: 10273092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Major changes loom for U.R.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Aug; 3(8):102-7. PubMed ID: 10273067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. PSROs to focus on use of hospital services.
    Smits H
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1979 Nov; 4(11):147. PubMed ID: 10273175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Variations on a theme. Dartmouth studies suggest that more care isn't always better, with better hospitals using fewer resources, physician visits.
    Fong T
    Mod Healthc; 2004 Oct; 34(41):6-7, 14, 1. PubMed ID: 15543825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. PSRO monitoring: trend analysis and peer review.
    Routch S
    J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 10297487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Continuing medical education and the Professional Standards Review Organizations.
    Inui TS
    Johns Hopkins Med J; 1976 Jul; 139(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 985991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The OPEL study intent and content.
    Dobson A; Davis F
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Oct; 4(10):19-23. PubMed ID: 104222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The economics of delegated vs. nondelegated PSRO review.
    Luecke RW
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Jul; 34(7):24-30. PubMed ID: 10273228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Editorial: PSRO's--dead or dying?
    Kaplan RI
    J Am Coll Dent; 1975 Oct; 42(4):190. PubMed ID: 1058908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Editorial: On measuring "quality" health care: beyond the hospital.
    Egdahl RH; Taft CH
    N Engl J Med; 1976 Jan; 294(3):161-2. PubMed ID: 942670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The relationship between the Professional Standards Review Organizations and the State Health Department.
    McGarvey MR
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 7052175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.