These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10273150)
21. Peer review organizations expected to have major impact on UR. Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Nov; 7(11):136-7. PubMed ID: 10273331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. New Medicare review system an option for private sector. Garrigan LA Bus Insur; 1986 Feb; 20(7):45-6. PubMed ID: 10324862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Government, PROs racing to implement tough review system. Wallace C Mod Healthc; 1984 Oct; 14(13):44-50. PubMed ID: 10299719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The new economics of PSRO review: an uncertain future. Luecke RW; Freeman JK Hosp Financ Manage; 1981 Apr; 35(4):56-8, 60, 62. PubMed ID: 10273247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The economics of delegated vs. nondelegated PSRO review. Luecke RW Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Jul; 34(7):24-30. PubMed ID: 10273228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. PSRO reduces admissions for three procedures by half. Schlein P Hosp Peer Rev; 1979 Dec; 4(12):165-7. PubMed ID: 10325181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers. Siegel SH Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hospital utilization review--an essential element in health care cost containment. Handel B Empl Benefits J; 1984 Sep; 9(3):8-12, 30. PubMed ID: 10273548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Going after favorable PRO determinations. Gosfield AG Cost Containment; 1985 Oct; 7(19):3-6. PubMed ID: 10273714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute. Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]