395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10273155)
1. Tough-minded cost control commission keeps lid on Maryland hospital rates.
Demkovich LE
Natl J (Wash); 1979 Aug; 11(33):1361-5. PubMed ID: 10273155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tracking down the health care dollar.
J Am Insur; 1978-1979 Winter; 54(4):15-20. PubMed ID: 10308909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Controlling hospital costs: the revealing case of Indiana.
O'Donoghue P
Mod Healthc; 1978 Nov; 8(11):42-5, 48, 51-3. PubMed ID: 151792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Hospital Capitation Payment Project: new incentives and tools for cost containment.
Elliott WB; Strand HM; Meyers FH; Getson JR; Paulson C; Hill JE; Hennings MN; Newman JF; Raichel TM
Inquiry; 1983; 20(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 6222981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital cost control plan the wrong idea: Chase study.
Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1979 Jun; 83(24):12-3. PubMed ID: 10242300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NHI draft limits hospital revenues, expenditures.
Simler SL
Mod Healthc; 1978 Nov; 8(11):27. PubMed ID: 151787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consumer charge: key to hospital autonomy and consumer responsibility.
Detwiller LF
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1979; 24(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 10241364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital price controls loom ahead if Carter anti-inflation program fails.
Simler SL
Mod Healthc; 1978 Dec; 8(12):12-3. PubMed ID: 152382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective reimbursement in Western Pennsylvania.
Sumner M; Gaumer G
Top Health Care Financ; 1979; 6(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 582632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-related charges, part of fair formulas and fules.
Stang MA
Hosp Prog; 1978 Aug; 59(8):30-1. PubMed ID: 352903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. State rate controls assailed, VE plan praised by four industry leaders: Neely/HAP.
Neely JR
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Dec; 11(7):24. PubMed ID: 10239097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court limits Mich. official's power over Blues.
Stoltz MK
Health Care Week; 1978 Oct; 2(16):3. PubMed ID: 10238786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. FAH president says N.D. victory emphasizes feeling on curbs.
Miller AW
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Dec; 11(7):18. PubMed ID: 10239093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Blues' consumer slant, tougher cost controls, strain hospital relations.
LaViolette S
Mod Healthc; 1979 Jun; 9(6):34-6. PubMed ID: 571520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. State hospital commission works to put the lid on rising health care costs.
Baker F; Bennett G
Forum (Wash); 1978; 2(3):2-9. PubMed ID: 569098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. State rate controls: documentation of the bureaucracy's imperfect plan.
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Dec; 11(7):11-3. PubMed ID: 10239091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Court of Appeals gives green light to Maryland's health cost commission.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Apr; 30(10):32, 35. PubMed ID: 829318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital cost control in Maryland.
Solomon N; Cohen HA
Forum (Wash); 1978; 2(5):12-9. PubMed ID: 572804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Organized opposition to Title II: committee seeks more members in industry.
Adair L
Surg Bus; 1978 Oct; 41(10):26-7. PubMed ID: 10238914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Antitrust implications of voluntary rate review.
Lipson SH
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1979; 24(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 10273119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
