These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10273494)

  • 1. A new era in medicine.
    Bollet AJ
    Resid Staff Physician; 1984 Mar; 30(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 10273494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective payment: a new direction for hospitals.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(2):24-6, 29-30, 33-4. PubMed ID: 10309843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective plan hurts poor manager.
    Wallace C
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Jun; 12(6):98-9. PubMed ID: 10273299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospitals spend 1985 adapting to PPS.
    Newald J
    Hospitals; 1985 Dec; 59(24):36, 38. PubMed ID: 3905570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical technology under PPS: an uncertain future.
    Roe WI
    Hospitals; 1985 Jan; 59(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 4038393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospitals upgrading computers in response to Medicare PPS.
    McDermott RE; Lloyd BR
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Jul; 15(14):182-4. PubMed ID: 10300194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DRG winners and losers affect profits under prospective payment.
    Mendenhall S
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Jul; 39(7):62-8. PubMed ID: 10311154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Payers share costs equally under NY law.
    Wallace C
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Sep; 12(9):56. PubMed ID: 10273305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deregulation of the health care industry: implications of financial change.
    Kaufman K
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1983 Oct; 1(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 10273434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspectives. Prospective payment: DRG era dawns.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1983 Sep; 37(35):4p. PubMed ID: 10310221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managers wanted. Case mix reimbursement demands managers, not facilitators.
    Mannisto M
    Hospitals; 1983 Mar; 57(6):91-3. PubMed ID: 6402443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Congress give hospitals a target rate per case.
    Richards G
    Hospitals; 1982 Oct; 56(20):76-82. PubMed ID: 6749642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Payment exposes faults in health care system.
    Robinson ML
    Hospitals; 1988 Dec; 62(24):18, 20. PubMed ID: 3198068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The prospective payment system for hospital reimbursement. Part I.
    Wilson CN; Meadors AC
    Hosp Admin Curr; 1984; 28(4):17-22. PubMed ID: 10299928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of hospital financial data.
    Selke G
    Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1986 Jun; 30(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 10311633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DRGs, incentives, hospitals, and physicians.
    Berki SE
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1985; 4(4):70-6. PubMed ID: 3938445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competition may undermine success of hospital reimbursement experiment.
    Graham J
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Dec; 16(26):48. PubMed ID: 10279862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hospital participation in alternative payment: developing a DRG-based system.
    Ellstein C; Wheeler JR
    Top Health Care Financ; 1986; 13(2):27-37. PubMed ID: 3101228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Financial managers face new challenges in proposed payment system.
    Braganza KE
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 10309846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surviving the challenge of the prospective payment system.
    Parrillo JW
    Issues Health Care; 1984; 5(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.