These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10273542)

  • 1. Medicare's review system: PROs.
    Erickson SA
    Mich Hosp; 1984 Aug; 20(8):21, 23. PubMed ID: 10273542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perspectives. PROs: Medicare's paper tigers?
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1988 Nov; 42(44):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10302877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overhauling Medicare's quality assurance program.
    Frank KM
    Nurs Econ; 1990; 8(2):68, 82. PubMed ID: 2184373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PROs likely to emerge as the watchdog of new payment system.
    Aronson P; Hellow J
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(3):50-2. PubMed ID: 10273351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PROs in transition.
    Bomberger I
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):22-4. PubMed ID: 10278605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medicare's peer review organizations. Renewed emphasis on quality of patient care.
    Sheehy TJ
    Resid Staff Physician; 1988 Apr; 34(4):63-5, 68-9. PubMed ID: 10302358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PROs explore changes in current review process.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1991 Apr; 76(4):24-6, 29. PubMed ID: 10109750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspectives. PROs set to go.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Nov; 38(45):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10273596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PROs will be variation on the PSRO theme.
    Hospitals; 1983 May; 57(10):59. PubMed ID: 6682399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PROs shift toward quality as HMO review nears.
    Cotton P
    Med World News; 1986 Dec; 27(24):46-8, 53-9. PubMed ID: 10279842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study prompts debate over PROs' focus.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1990 Mar; 20(12):43. PubMed ID: 10104040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perspectives. PROs: modification and expansion.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Aug; 39(33):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10300446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HCFA is not imposing quotas on PROs, administrator says.
    Davis CK
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(6):50-1. PubMed ID: 10273635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PROs gear up for their changing health care roles. Interview by Jeffrey Finn.
    Webber A
    Hospitals; 1986 Jun; 60(11):82-3. PubMed ID: 3699767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of PROs on hospitals and pharmacy practice.
    Black BL
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Jan; 44(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3548342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicare's new red flag: same-day readmissions.
    Finger AL
    Med Econ; 2000 Jul; 77(13):41, 44, 49. PubMed ID: 11010492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feds' new PROs dismay peer review's fans and foes.
    Frabotta J
    Med World News; 1982 Dec; 23(25):58-60, 65-6, 75, 78. PubMed ID: 10273323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolving scope of PROs. Interview by Jane Stein.
    Weiser RR
    Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10284429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blizzard of paperwork, new rules are burying PROs and hospitals.
    Baldwin MF; Fackelmann KA
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jan; 16(1):46-50, 54. PubMed ID: 10300520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MSMS works with PSROs to create best possible peer review system.
    Mich Med; 1979 Jan; 78(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 570631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.