180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10273567)
1. Challenge for nursing: hiking productivity without lowering quality of care.
Franz J
Mod Healthc; 1984 Sep; 14(12):60-4, 68. PubMed ID: 10273567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The challenge of prospective pricing: work smarter.
Olsen SM
J Nurs Adm; 1984 Apr; 14(4):22-6. PubMed ID: 6423787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective payment: focus on nursing administration.
Donaho BA
ANA Publ; 1984 Apr; (G-164):36-9. PubMed ID: 6563865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The DRG challenge is to ensure quality.
Heinz J
Provider; 1986 Jun; 12(6):11-2. PubMed ID: 10311563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Most administrators fear care quality will be hurt by prospective payment.
Jackson B; Jensen J
Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(15):108-10. PubMed ID: 10273601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring cost and quality of care under prospective reimbursement.
Mushlin AI
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jun; 13(6):17-21. PubMed ID: 10273559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategic planning: nursing practice in the PPS.
Porter-O'Grady T
Nurs Manage; 1985 Oct; 16(10):53-6. PubMed ID: 3934606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nursing case management: affecting quality and cost.
Bryan B; Dickerson D; Fleming MA; Gholston L; Thompson L
Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1994 Nov; 16(2):63-75. PubMed ID: 10137783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coping with PPS and DRGs: the levels-of-care approach.
Deines E
Nurs Manage; 1985 Oct; 16(10):43-52. PubMed ID: 3934605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. PPS and quality care: can they coexist?
Vladeck BC
Healthspan; 1986 Jan; 3(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 10311449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective payment and malpractice: can higher quality be consistent with lower costs?
Braganza KE; Simmons LP
Mich Hosp; 1983 Dec; 19(12):9-13. PubMed ID: 10310329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bar coding. An effective productivity concept.
Addams HL; Bracci L; Overfelt FC
J Nurs Adm; 1991 Oct; 21(10):54-60. PubMed ID: 1919775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lawmakers focus on hospital-DRG squeeze.
Baldwin MF
Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(7):54-8. PubMed ID: 10311030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lessons in balancing cost and quality.
Miccio BL
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Dec; 5(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 10273595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DRG's: de revenue's gone!!
Mitchell K
Pediatr Nurs; 1984; 10(5):317. PubMed ID: 6435078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. RUGs and "Medi-Cal" systems for classifying nursing home patients.
Grimaldi PL
Health Prog; 1985 Dec; 66(10):50-7. PubMed ID: 10300512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing prospective payment.
Steinwald B
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1986 Jul; 71(7):4-6. PubMed ID: 10277276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Productivity by design.
Dobson J
Calif Hosp; 1992; 6(3):16-8. PubMed ID: 10119057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In the wake of cost cutting, nursing productivity and quality improve.
Helt EH; Jelinek RC
Nurs Manage; 1988 Jun; 19(6):36-8, 42, 46-8. PubMed ID: 3380483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective payment has positive effect on staff.
Jomaoas DB
Laund News; 1985 Aug; 11(8):9. PubMed ID: 10273662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
