These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10274185)

  • 1. Trouble in Vineville: church property and the civil courts.
    Cribari SJ
    Health Prog; 1985; 66(6):55-9, 70. PubMed ID: 10274185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Religious hiring exemption upheld: anatomy of a Supreme Court ruling.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1988; 69(6):40-4, 47. PubMed ID: 10288412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A just alternative. Church tribunals may be the best forum for settling wrongful discharge disputes.
    Fitzgerald JM; Fitzgerald LM
    Health Prog; 1991 Sep; 72(7):56-9, 72. PubMed ID: 10112959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the Hyde Amendment violate religious freedom? Harris v. McRae and the First Amendment.
    Gold JA
    Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(3):361-72. PubMed ID: 7468604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interview with Jeffrey Bronfman, representative mestre for the UniĆ£o do Vegetal Church in the United States. Interview by Marlene Dobkin de Rios and Charles S Grob.
    Bronfman J
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2005 Jun; 37(2):189-91. PubMed ID: 16149332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Supreme Court, "Our Town," and disability policy: boardrooms and bedrooms, courtrooms and cloakrooms.
    Stowe MJ; Turnbull HR; Sublet C
    Ment Retard; 2006 Apr; 44(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 16689619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The law and ethics in relation to dentists treating HIV-positive patients: report on a recent U.S. Supreme Court case.
    Graham PE; Harel-Reviv M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Jan; 65(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9973763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Amos decision: will we see changes in the workplace?
    Rogers JW; Stromberger PM
    Health Prog; 1988; 69(6):45-7. PubMed ID: 10288413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First amendment -- California Supreme Court holds that free exercise of religion does not give fertility doctors right to deny treatment to lesbians. -- North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. San Diego County Superior Court, 189 P.3d 959 (Cal. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Dec; 122(2):787-94. PubMed ID: 19130682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equality in hiring permanent resident foreign nationals in the United States: when loyalty is the question, but not the issue.
    Wiersma UJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(1-2):141-60. PubMed ID: 11979496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dress codes and appearance policies: challenges under federal legislation, part 1: title VII of the civil rights act and religion.
    Mitchell MS; Koen CM; Moore TW
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2013; 32(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 24168864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The constitutional balance between health and liberty.
    Merritt DJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):suppl 2-10. PubMed ID: 3542899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of the University of Michigan U.S. Supreme Court decision to dental education.
    Sinkford JC; Valachovic RW
    J Dent Educ; 2003 Sep; 67(9):963-4. PubMed ID: 14518833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scrutiny Land: Scrutiny Land is the place where government needs to justify to a court its restrictions on the liberties of the people.
    Barnett RE
    Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1479-500. PubMed ID: 18595211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Capital punishment of kids: when courts permit parents to act on their religious beliefs at the expense of their children's lives.
    Anderson JJ
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Apr; 46(3):755-77. PubMed ID: 16514786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology.
    Hemphill L
    Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Pennsylvania abortion case.
    Benshoof J
    Touro Law Rev; 1993; 9(2):217-49. PubMed ID: 11656382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent developments in health insurance, life insurance, and disability insurance case law.
    Hasman JJ; Chittenden WA; Doolin EG; Wall JF
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2008; 43(3):473-517. PubMed ID: 18828249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.