These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10274870)

  • 1. Michigan appellate court upholds peer review committee's decision.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jan; 16(1):118-9. PubMed ID: 10274870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Texas Appellate Court decision on privileged information/disclosure discussed.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1986 Sep; 42(4):34, 39. PubMed ID: 10279558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records.
    Peterson RN
    Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital peer review committees: privileges of confidentiality and immunity.
    Butler RE
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1983 Sep; 5(7):7-31. PubMed ID: 10262536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations.
    Mustes JJ; Popovits RM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discoverability and admissibility of medical staff committee records: a state-by-state analysis.
    Roach WH
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 10252569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Committee's records privileged.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1986 Jan; 41(8):10-1. PubMed ID: 10275729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach.
    Mills DH
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MD defames colleague in staff committee meeting.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1979 Sep; 60(9):96,98. PubMed ID: 468199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protecting hospitals from judicial narrowing of state peer review statutes.
    Lending RM
    Healthspan; 1990 Oct; 7(9):8-11. PubMed ID: 10107402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases.
    Leiker M
    WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidentiality vs. the need to know.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1981 Sep; 55(17):41-2, 47. PubMed ID: 7275045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer participation in hospital department review.
    Peters DS
    Hosp Adm (Chic); 1975; 20(2):8-15. PubMed ID: 10294905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facts about the Special Committee on Peer Review/Care and Well-Being.
    Oles J
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2010 Dec; 92(12):22. PubMed ID: 21291088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discoverability of peer review committee records.
    Roach WH
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Jun; 4(4):83-5. PubMed ID: 10266787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring quality: the patient care committee's role.
    Lydgate WA
    Trustee; 1987 May; 40(5):20-1. PubMed ID: 10282015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surveillance technique: a wound study sheet.
    Nottebart HC
    Hosp Infect Control; 1978 Jul; 5(7):118-21. PubMed ID: 10308224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer Review Privilege Upheld in Michigan's Supreme Court.
    Schulte DJ
    Mich Med; 2015; 114(4):4. PubMed ID: 26368998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Washington State Supreme Court protects quality review committee records.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 10265237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Idaho Court: peer review immunity statute valid.
    Hattis PA; McCullum JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1987 Nov; 10(24):1-3. PubMed ID: 10284895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.