BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10275122)

  • 21. Pointers for picking an HMO heavyweight.
    Drury P
    Group Pract J; 1986; 35(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10275819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hospital-HMO relations: the health alliance experience.
    Campbell DJ; Peters DS
    Health Serv Manager; 1980 Sep; 13(9):6, 11-2. PubMed ID: 10248326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to avoid problems when forming partnerships.
    Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1996 Jul; 4(15):7. PubMed ID: 10159361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. HMO/hospital balance: relative strength is important in a managed care program.
    Kovener RR
    Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1987; 20(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 10281151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Close relationship with SNFs benefits both parties.
    Hosp Case Manag; 2003 Dec; 11(12):179-80. PubMed ID: 14621534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Designing an effective admissions process.
    Harris C
    Provider; 1999 Mar; 25(3):suppl 12-3. PubMed ID: 10350882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rutgers HMO enrollments far exceed projections.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1978 Oct; 33(4):12. PubMed ID: 10277884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Seattle HMO, system to strengthen alliance.
    Kertesz L
    Mod Healthc; 1996 Jan; 26(1):12. PubMed ID: 10153703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Medical school and HMO affiliate; 200 students to enroll in program.
    Bendix J
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Feb; 12(2):38. PubMed ID: 10254278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. K.C. Blues dissolves HMO joint venture.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2001 Apr; 31(17):22-3. PubMed ID: 11338895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Your E.C.F. affiliation should meet these tests.
    Rourke AJ
    Mod Hosp; 1969 Feb; 112(2):114. PubMed ID: 5784385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Moratorium forces Wisconsin SNFs and hospitals into partnerships.
    Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1996 Apr; 4(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 10157758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subacute strategies. Partnerships are crucial for small providers.
    Anders KT
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1996 May; 19(5):65. PubMed ID: 10157780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Problems with SNFs? Seek out compromises.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):157-8. PubMed ID: 10621285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mass. medical center, HMO in effort to beat prices of competitors.
    Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1994 Apr; 24(14):30. PubMed ID: 10132733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. HMOs and home care: defining the partnership.
    Cossette M
    Caring; 1987 Jul; 6(7):8-11. PubMed ID: 10283323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. To partner or not to partner? More than ever, hospitals are open to working with SNFs.
    Griffin KM
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1999 Mar; 22(3):36. PubMed ID: 10351364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-year appraisal of a hospital-home affiliation.
    Lee SS; May MI
    Hospitals; 1968 Aug; 42(16):103-6 passim. PubMed ID: 5666015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Group's arrangement with subacute firm seeks savings.
    Pallarito K
    Mod Healthc; 1993 Mar; 23(10):34. PubMed ID: 10124333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Florida public hospital, HMO, university form partnership.
    Greene J
    Mod Healthc; 1995 Jun; 25(26):20. PubMed ID: 10143725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.