262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10275723)
21. Healthcare CEOs and CFOs report on vendor problems.
Walker L
Healthc Comput Commun; 1985 Mar; 2(3):56, 58. PubMed ID: 10270200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Software primer. Information processing standards.
Beach LM
Inf Manage; 1984 Feb; 18(2):30, 32. PubMed ID: 10278221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating the microcomputer-based cost system.
McClymonds B; Howard P
Comput Healthc; 1985 Jul; 6(7):18-24. PubMed ID: 10271766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Implementing an automated inventory system.
Shultz SM; Kannen W
Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1983 Nov; 5(2):25-31. PubMed ID: 10263255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. An automated pharmacy management system makes a difference.
Zaleski R
Comput Healthc; 1983 Apr; 4(4):18-20. PubMed ID: 10259382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Be 'budget-wise'--know computers before you buy.
Kitanik B
J Am Health Care Assoc; 1985 Nov; 11(7):64-5. PubMed ID: 10274214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Consider micro standardization.
Wodinsky HB
Health Care (Don Mills); 1984 Feb; 26(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 10265247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Selecting an automated patient accounting system.
Ginsburg DA; Caretta W
Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Jun; 40(6):58-62. PubMed ID: 10276680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bar coding: standardized product codes needed to make it work.
HPN Hosp Purch News; 1983 Mar; 7(3):26-9. PubMed ID: 10258729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A computerized medical information system--sustaining benefits previously achieved.
Blask D; Cleary J; Dux L
Healthc Comput Commun; 1985 Dec; 2(12):60-4. PubMed ID: 10311368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Tap in-house, vendor help for RMIS.
Tweedy DA
Bus Insur; 1985 Oct; 19(42):50. PubMed ID: 10274031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. How to select and implement case-mix (product-line analysis) systems.
Barnard C
Hosp Forum; 1985; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 10310939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Best overall performance. The HIS awards.
Grams RR
Comput Healthc; 1985 Mar; 6(3):27-8. PubMed ID: 10270066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Medium size rural hospital achieves success.
Molsbee JA
Comput Healthc; 1984 Feb; 5(2):44-9. PubMed ID: 10278219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Micro users must meet rigid guidelines to tap data bases.
Yanish D
Mod Healthc; 1984 Aug; 14(10):106-8. PubMed ID: 10267479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. $2 billion spent on systems, but hospitals still dissatisfied.
Dorenfest SI
Mod Healthc; 1982 Nov; 12(11):65-6, 68, 70. PubMed ID: 10309760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Our system is comprehensive, but not complex.
Goodyear RR
Comput Healthc; 1985 Aug; 6(8):49-50, 54. PubMed ID: 10311202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hospital plans savings with system.
Stokes R
Aust Hosp; 1985 Jul; (98):7. PubMed ID: 10273012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Thoughts about thinking from the President-elect of HISSG.
Rosquist WV
Comput Healthc; 1985 Jan; 6(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 10269324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Multi-function systems of information management are "harbingers of the paperless hospital".
South Hosp; 1982; 50(6):7-8, 11. PubMed ID: 10257669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
