These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Dipping and coating operations. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1999 Mar; 64(55):13897-912. PubMed ID: 10558408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Respiratory protection--OSHA. Final rule; request for comment on paperwork requirements. Fed Regist; 1998 Jan; 63(5):1152-300. PubMed ID: 10177058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The new OSHA rules and the worker's right to know. McGarity TO Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):38-45. PubMed ID: 6237075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. OSHA's hazard communication standard. What it means for U.S. hospitals. Health Devices; 2001 Jun; 30(6):213-8. PubMed ID: 11447866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is "right to know"? Reviewing the Hazard Communication Standard. Fluke C J Healthc Mater Manage; 1989; 7(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 10291880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. OSHA's final rule on occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Domin MA; Smith CE J Healthc Mater Manage; 1992 Mar; 10(2):36, 38, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 10116766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complying with right-to-know is a state versus federal problem. Fox LA Occup Health Saf; 1986 Apr; 55(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 3703421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Toxic chemical information systems and right-to-know. Cole HS J Public Health Policy; 1986; 7(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 3700642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the accuracy of OSHA's projections of the benefits of new safety standards. Seong SK; Mendeloff J Am J Ind Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):313-28. PubMed ID: 15029563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compliance with new OSHA bloodborne standard. Voldish K N J Med; 1992 Apr; 89(4):305-6. PubMed ID: 1603438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]