262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10276868)
1. The National Labor Relations Act and employment-at-will: the federal preemption docrine revisited.
Zimmerman DA; Howard-Martin J
Labor Law J; 1986 Apr; 37(4):223-34. PubMed ID: 10276868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court, 1978-79--labor relations and employment discrimination.
Modjeska L
Cornell Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 65(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 10245115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fifty years under the National Labor Relations Act: a retrospective view.
Gould WB
Labor Law J; 1986 Apr; 37(4):235-43. PubMed ID: 10300812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Federal regulations of labor-management relations.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1980 Aug; 36(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 10248196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The National Labor Relations Act: a potential legal constraint upon quality circles and other employer-sponsored employee committees.
Behrens CK; Sollenberger JR
Labor Law J; 1983 Dec; 34(12):776-80. PubMed ID: 10265365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An 'enlightened' view of employee committees under the Taft-Hartley Act.
Klaper MJ
Employee Relat Law J; 1983-1984 Winter; 9(3):474-84. PubMed ID: 10265039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Labor Reform Act of 1977: a detailed analysis.
Nash PG
Employee Relat Law J; 1978; 4(1):59-80. PubMed ID: 10308047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What hospitals have to fear from labor law reform.
Hosp Prog; 1978 Sep; 59(9):8, 12. PubMed ID: 680685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A brief history of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Nordlund WJ
Labor Law J; 1988 Nov; 39(11):715-28. PubMed ID: 10290902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Abrogation of a labor agreement at the request of a trade union organ].
Marakushev AA
Feldsher Akush; 1985 Aug; 50(8):58-60. PubMed ID: 3850823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Totality"--right or wrong: the totality trilogy.
Lederer PC
Employee Relat Law J; 1981; 6(4):620-34. PubMed ID: 10250922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 1983-1984 Supreme Court term promises significant labor decisions.
Peterson RN
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(21):20-3. PubMed ID: 10317377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Are worker participation plans "labor organizations" within the meaning of Section 2(5)?: a proposed framework of analysis.
Beaver MS
Labor Law J; 1985 Apr; 36(4):226-37. PubMed ID: 10270759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A proposal for a nonreinstatement rule in unfair labor practice cases involving patient abuse.
Tully CT
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(3):319-41. PubMed ID: 3842233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A question of authority.
Vaccaro PL; Bryant MR
Provider; 1994 Feb; 20(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 10132004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonunion staff has right to representation.
Kruchko JG; Dube LE
Hospitals; 1983 Apr; 57(8):48. PubMed ID: 6832735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Fair Labor Standards Act: a potential legal constraint upon quality circles and other employee participation programs.
Richmond WL; Reynolds DL
Labor Law J; 1986 Apr; 37(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 10276869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Managed care and labor issues: Part I--Termination issues.
Maltz A
Med Interface; 1994 Dec; 7(12):113-5. PubMed ID: 10139397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proactive strategies may prevent union organizing activities.
Vaccaro PL; Bryant MR
Provider; 1993 Nov; 19(11):49-50. PubMed ID: 10129960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Managing safety and health.
Harrison AJ
Labor Law J; 1981 Oct; 32(10):635-58 concl. PubMed ID: 10253201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
