These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. The litigation exposures posed by preferred provider organizations. Vienna AM Personnel; 1984; 61(5):19-23. PubMed ID: 10268428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Why the feds drove these doctors out of business. Hung K Med Econ; 1985 Apr; 62(7):92-4, 99, 102 passim. PubMed ID: 10278314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Arizona v. Maricopa County: a stern antitrust warning to healthcare providers. Halper HR Healthc Financ Manage; 1982 Oct; 36(10):38-42. PubMed ID: 10315212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Non-physician providers vs. Foundation Health Plan--a major restraint-of-trade case study. Ashley L; Kelly P Nurse Pract; 1987 Nov; 12(11):50-3, 56. PubMed ID: 3696538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Questioning assumptions about preferred provider arrangements. Boland P Inquiry; 1985; 22(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 3159669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The effect of injecting price competition into the hospital market: the case of preferred provider organizations. Dranove D; Satterthwaite M; Sindelar J Inquiry; 1986; 23(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 2947862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluating antitrust risk in joint provider negotiations with payors. Leonard EJ Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10115450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Antitrust and health care: provider controlled health plans and the Maricopa decision. Weller CD Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(3):223-49. PubMed ID: 6897759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Recent supreme court antitrust rulings in health care. Podell LB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Apr; 40(4):639-41. PubMed ID: 6846375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Physicians and PPOs: antitrust considerations in setting fees. Fried JM; Romansky MA Internist; 1984 Apr; 25(4):18, 32. PubMed ID: 10266538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Physicians under siege: the Federal Trade Commission versus the physicians of St. Francis Hospital. Rosen BF Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):73-6. PubMed ID: 10290186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Justice Dept. business review approves hospital-controlled PPO. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jun; 10(12):5-6. PubMed ID: 10282183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Ball Memorial Hospital: Section 2 Sherman Act analysis in the alternative health care delivery market. Kirsch T Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(2-3):249-79. PubMed ID: 3072878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Establishing physician networks within evolving antitrust guidelines. Retchin TN; Retchin SM Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1997; 5(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 10169186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Will the courts blow PPOs out of the water? Larson JL Physicians Manage; 1984 Nov; 24(11):149-52, 156, 159 passim. PubMed ID: 10269233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]