387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10277355)
1. The lessons of Quinlan.
Drane JF
Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. From Quinlan to Jobes: the courts and the PVS patient.
Armstrong PW; Colen BD
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 3350650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Quinlan case: death decision by committee.
Annas GJ
New Physician; 1979 Feb; 28(2):53-4, 56. PubMed ID: 10240660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Pulling the plug": are you ready to make the decision?
Ginsburg WH
Physicians Manage; 1985 Mar; 25(3):349-51, 354, 357-60 passim. PubMed ID: 10270469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. After Quinlan: the impact of the Saikewicz decision.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1979 Jul; 43(7):455. PubMed ID: 477310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan.
Lynn J
Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
Merritt TL
Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Shapiro RS
Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidelines for health care. Facilities in the care of comatose patients. Declaration by state agencies of endorsement of guidelines for implementation of Quinlan decision.
J Med Soc N J; 1977 Apr; 74(4):368-71. PubMed ID: 265414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective.
Ackerman JW; Pope MC
J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Baby Doe committees: a critical evaluation.
Mahowald MB
Clin Perinatol; 1988 Dec; 15(4):789-800. PubMed ID: 3208479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Quinlan decision: five commentaries. Beyond an ethic of immediate sympathy.
Oden TC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Feb; 6(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 1254450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical issues in withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
Gramelspacher GP
Indiana Med; 1992; 85(3):218-21. PubMed ID: 1602123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Quinlan decision: five commentaries. Obscuring the role of the physician.
Branson R; Casebeer K
Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Feb; 6(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 1254463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In the matter of Nancy Ellen Jobes.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 3638288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What is extraordinary life support?
Jonsen AR
West J Med; 1984 Sep; 141(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 6506674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Quinlan decision: five commentaries. Prolonged dying: not medically indicated.
Ramsey P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Feb; 6(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 1254451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
Baron CH
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
