These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10277356)
1. The consistent ethic of life. Bernardin J; Cardinal Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):48-51. PubMed ID: 10277356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Chicago commission speaks out on nutrition and hydration. Health Prog; 1987 Dec; 68(10):35-6, 68. PubMed ID: 10312336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. Catholic bishops on nutrition and hydration: a second opinion. Connors RB J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(3):253-5. PubMed ID: 8219312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The consistent ethic of life and health care systems. Bernardin J Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 11651841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withdrawing nutrition and hydration. The Catholic tradition offers guidance for the treatment of patients in a persistent vegetative state. Panicola MR Health Prog; 2001; 82(6):28-33. PubMed ID: 11763577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On prolonging life. Moraczewski AS Health Prog; 1988 Jun; 69(5):10, 12. PubMed ID: 10287451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Principles in regard to withholding or withdrawing artificially assisted nutrition/hydration. McHugh JT Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 2114380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should nutrition and hydration be provided to permanently unconscious and other mentally disabled persons? O'Rourke K Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 2621090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Applying the Directives. The Ethical and Religious Directives concerning three medical situations require some elucidation. O'Rourke KD Health Prog; 1998; 79(4):64-9. PubMed ID: 10181596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The ordinary-extraordinary distinction reconsidered: a moral context for the proper calculus of benefits and burdens. Bole TJ HEC Forum; 1990; 2(4):219-32. PubMed ID: 10105604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Catholic views on life. Furton EJ Hastings Cent Rep; 2002; 32(3):4-5; author reply 5. PubMed ID: 12085514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Physicians, not priests: Veatch and Spicer's response. Veatch RM; Spicer CM Health Prog; 1994; 75(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 10131081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nutrition and hydration: moral and pastoral reflections. National Conference of Catholic Bishops Committee for Pro-life Activities. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):455-77. PubMed ID: 10394763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bishops' response to Act on Rights of Terminally Ill. Brodeur D Health Prog; 1987; 68(1):22-5, 94. PubMed ID: 10280352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The consistent ethic. Bernardin J Second Opin; 1988; (8):102-13. PubMed ID: 10288786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The case. Hoses and hope. Frader JE Second Opin; 1992 Jul; 18(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 10120619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Catholic positions on withholding sustenance for the terminally ill. McCartney JJ Health Prog; 1986 Oct; 67(8):38-40. PubMed ID: 10311726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of life: a focus on the patient's total good. Gula RM Health Prog; 1988; 69(6):34-9, 84. PubMed ID: 10288411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolution of Church teaching on prolonging life. O'Rourke K Health Prog; 1988; 69(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 10302089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]