These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10277547)

  • 21. Antitrust immunity in Colorado peer review actions.
    Earnest GL
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Dec; 7(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 10296371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. California High Court rules on ability to work with others as criterion for medical staff privileges: must be related to patient care.
    Schwartz R
    Health Law Vigil; 1980 Aug; 3(17):1-2. PubMed ID: 10247620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hospital antitrust suit settled.
    Am Med News; 1981 Nov 20-27; 24(44):9. PubMed ID: 10253695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Federal court refuses to honor state statutory privilege for proceedings of medical staff credentials committee.
    Schwartz RL
    Health Law Vigil; 1981 Nov; 4(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10253107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What considerations should hospitals have in mind when contemplating "exclusive" agreements with hospital-based physicians?
    Jergesen AD; Schnier SV
    Hosp Forum; 1978 Sep; 21(3):54, 52. PubMed ID: 10237611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. If you should lose a peer review suit.
    Holoweiko M
    Med Econ; 1988 Dec; 65(24):140-4, 147-8, 150-1 passim. PubMed ID: 10290905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hospital authority can enforce rules, Georgia court says.
    Hospitals; 1978 Oct; 52(19):19-20. PubMed ID: 689612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Court ruling clarifies judicial review of physician's ouster by hospital.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(14):168-70. PubMed ID: 10268798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Court sets rules on physician suspensions.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Mar; 18(12):43. PubMed ID: 10286496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When exclusive service contracts go to court.
    Southwick AF
    Trustee; 1978 Jan; 31(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10305839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Idaho Court: peer review immunity statute valid.
    Hattis PA; McCullum JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1987 Nov; 10(24):1-3. PubMed ID: 10284895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Court halts hospital discrimination against podiatrists. Dooley v. Barberton Citizens Hospital.
    Mittleman L
    Health Matrix; 1985; 3(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 10272768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Arizona court OKs malpractice insurance requirement for physicians.
    Cheifetz W
    Trustee; 1978 Feb; 31(2):6, 8. PubMed ID: 10305846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gianetti v Norwalk Hospital: Connecticut Supreme Court rules on hospital and medical staff member contractual relationship and judicial review of medical staff termination decisions.
    Ronai SE; Hyman PE
    Conn Med; 1989 Jul; 53(7):425-6. PubMed ID: 2758833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Osteopaths score their biggest court victory yet.
    Brown S
    Med Econ; 1984 Aug; 61(16):230-1, 235-8. PubMed ID: 10278257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cardiologists' complaint alleging denial of opportunity to perform procedures at hospital violate Sherman Act and civil rights dismissed by district court.
    Kaunitz KK
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Apr; 5(8):7-9. PubMed ID: 10254849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Court scrutinizes hospital's exclusive contract with specialists.
    Jenkins SM
    Hosp Risk Manage; 1982 Dec; 4(12):170-2. PubMed ID: 10258749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hospital has absolute control over staff privileges.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1983 Sep; 64(9):70, 72. PubMed ID: 10262305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distinguishing between practice privileges and political rights in the hospital medical staff.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Apr; 6(6):1-5. PubMed ID: 10294699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.