These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10277562)

  • 1. On the question of Baby Doe.
    Asch A
    Health PAC Bull; 1986 Aug; 16(6):6, 8-10. PubMed ID: 10277562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the question of Baby Doe.
    Rothman BK
    Health PAC Bull; 1986 Aug; 16(6):7, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10277563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whatever happened to Baby Doe?
    Vernon J
    Neonatal Netw; 1998 Mar; 17(2):73-4. PubMed ID: 9592503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Baby Doe rules.
    Angell M
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Mar; 314(10):642-4. PubMed ID: 2935736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The case of Baby Jane Doe.
    Press A; Cooper N; Hager M; Howard L
    Newsweek; 1983 Nov; 102(22):45-6. PubMed ID: 10263113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Government intervention: "the Baby Doe rule".
    McCullough LB
    New Physician; 1983 May; 32(5):47-8. PubMed ID: 10262468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Baby Doe' controversy continuing.
    Krieger L
    Am Med News; 1983 May; 26(17):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10261416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ACP: Baby Doe rule should be revised.
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983 Oct; 3(9):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10264533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The stormy legacy of Baby Doe.
    Wallis C; Constable A; Gribben S
    Time; 1983 Sep; 122(13):58. PubMed ID: 10262067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspectives. Baby Doe reconsidered.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Jan; 38(3):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical ethics in neurology and neurosurgery.
    Black PM
    Neurol Clin; 1985 May; 3(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 3160924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. As I see it: Baby Doe.
    Jellison MD
    Trustee; 1984 Jan; 37(1):47. PubMed ID: 10264502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reagan Administration revises "Baby Doe" regulations.
    Iglehart JK
    Hosp Prog; 1984 Feb; 65(2):17, 20. PubMed ID: 10317422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Baby Doe: AHA prevails in Supreme Court.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):1-4. PubMed ID: 10276708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AHA files motion to have Baby Doe regulations declared invalid.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 10265236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. District Court judge invalidates Baby Doe regulations.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 10266524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Baby Doe legislation passes in the House...despite newly adopted HHS regulations on the care of handicapped infants.
    Prout DM
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1984 Mar; 4(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 10266046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HHS reissues "Baby Doe" regulations; provider concerns remain unaddressed.
    McCann RW
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Jul; 6(14):1-3. PubMed ID: 10260939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perspectives. The continuing saga of Baby Doe.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Aug; 38(32):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Baby Doe compromise shifts burden to state protection agencies.
    Wallace C
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(14):27-8. PubMed ID: 10268799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.