386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10278081)
1. CON process causes huge waste, duplication by providers, planners.
Horty JF
Mod Healthc; 1980 Nov; 10(11):104, 107. PubMed ID: 10278081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Certificate of need.
Harris S
J Am Health Care Assoc; 1981 Jan; 7(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 10273240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Texas Health Facilities Commission.
Himmelblau B
Tex Hosp; 1982 Dec; 38(7):17-9. PubMed ID: 10278136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Public Health Service--Health systems agency and state health planning and development agency reviews: certificate of need programs. Final regulation.
Fed Regist; 1980 Oct; 45(205):69740-73. PubMed ID: 10248452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public Health Service--health systems agencies and state health planning and development agencies; certificate of need reviews. Notice regarding certificate of need programs.
Fed Regist; 1980 Feb; 45(37):12174-85. PubMed ID: 10245320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Getting your certificate of need approved.
Crum GE
J Long Term Care Adm; 1985; 13(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10270752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health systems agency and state health planning and development agency reviews; certificate of need programs--PHS.
Fed Regist; 1985 Jan; 50(9):2008-20. PubMed ID: 10270031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The implementation of health systems plans.
Myrtle RC; Kerschner HK
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1980 Aug; 3(1):6-28. PubMed ID: 10273220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Health planning and certificate of need: the quality dimension.
Hershey N; Robinson D
Health Policy Q; 1981; 1(4):243-68. PubMed ID: 10315157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Appropriateness review: still an ill-defined process.
Kopit WG
Hosp Prog; 1981 Mar; 62(3):54-6. PubMed ID: 10273244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anti-blackmail rule eases CONs.
Simler SL
Mod Healthc; 1979 Nov; 9(11):54. PubMed ID: 492120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New health planning law gives a greater voice to mental health proponents.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Feb; 31(2):143-4. PubMed ID: 7353839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Future status of project review programs in health planning process remains uncertain.
Wellborn JL
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(5):44-6. PubMed ID: 10270113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Certificate of need: a physician concern.
Antlitz AM; Boyer E
Md State Med J; 1979 Jun; 28(6):45-7. PubMed ID: 491769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. State health planning law.
Harris S
J Am Health Care Assoc; 1980 Nov; 6(6):25-6. PubMed ID: 10249068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Conference on Health Planning and Development.
Keener WR
Tex Hosp; 1980 Sep; 36(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 10278071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Texas Health Facilities Commission: annual reporting requirements.
Hurst OR
Tex Hosp; 1981 Jan; 36(8):9. PubMed ID: 10278083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Certificate of need and the pitfalls of due process.
Consedine JF; Jekel JF; Dunaye TM
Inquiry; 1980; 17(4):348-56. PubMed ID: 6450167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Health systems agencies and state health planning and development agencies; certificate of need reviews--Health Resources and Services Administration. Notice regarding adjustment of the expenditure minimum for capital expenditures and the expenditure minimum for annual operating costs.
Fed Regist; 1983 Apr; 48(70):15539. PubMed ID: 10259828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Humana's exemption from Ky. CON process approved.
Nemes J
Mod Healthc; 1990 Jun; 20(24):3-4. PubMed ID: 10105084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
