These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10278122)

  • 1. FTC tells Iowa Dental Association that fee peer review program does not violate antitrust.
    Kopit WG; Kaunitz KK
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Jun; 5(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 10278122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical staff peer review and federal antitrust scrutiny.
    LaCava FW
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Aug; 70(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 10272117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antitrust law and peer review remain at odds.
    Riffer J
    Hospitals; 1986 Feb; 60(3):58. PubMed ID: 3753695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. States can't shield peer review from antitrust--high court.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1988 May; 18(21):5. PubMed ID: 10324515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Courts and Congress shield peer review process from antitrust liability.
    Halper HR
    Bus Health; 1987 Jan; 4(3):59. PubMed ID: 10280004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Opening the antitrust door wider.
    Donlan TG
    Physicians Manage; 1988 Aug; 28(8):40, 45. PubMed ID: 10288463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antitrust law and the medical staff.
    Holthaus D
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):23. PubMed ID: 10288093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appeals Court limits antitrust review of physician-hospital disputes.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Sep; 11(19):3-4. PubMed ID: 10288887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antitrust. Is quality review in jeopardy?
    Pollner F
    Med World News; 1988 Jun; 29(12):34-6, 38, 43-7. PubMed ID: 10287973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Federal law offers protection for peer review.
    Holthaus D
    Hospitals; 1988 Jul; 62(13):46, 48. PubMed ID: 3384418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eleventh Circuit allows state action defense in medical staff antitrust case.
    Miller RD
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Jan; 6(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 10292016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review after Patrick.
    Gebhard PG; Polk DJ
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1988 Oct; 73(10):4-7. PubMed ID: 10289975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Staff privileges--$2 million antitrust judgment reversed.
    Carlson DR
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(21):1-4. PubMed ID: 10284024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent case offers hospitals new protection from antitrust liability.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1985 Jul; 41(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 10278343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of Patrick v. Burget on peer review.
    Gainer PS; Miles JJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):13-21. PubMed ID: 10290181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical peer review under legal knife.
    Kosterlitz J
    Natl J (Wash); 1988 Mar; 20(13):820. PubMed ID: 10286588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitfalls of peer review: lesson from the Patrick case.
    Vander Veer JB
    Physicians Manage; 1985 Oct; 25(10):162-3, 166-9. PubMed ID: 10278364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Court's ruling could cripple peer review.
    Geisel J
    Bus Insur; 1982 Jul; 16(28):1, 44. PubMed ID: 10255884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review in the wake of Patrick.
    McCormick B
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Groups seek protection for peer review.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Jan; 18(4):4. PubMed ID: 10285506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.