These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10278262)
21. The sleeping giant awakens: the physician and the antitrust laws. Hirsh HL Leg Med; 1985; ():334-56. PubMed ID: 3835424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. New face at the bargaining table. McCann RW; Tomaselli LA Hospitals; 1983 Oct; 57(20):75-9. PubMed ID: 6352455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Competition and the antitrust laws: restraint of trade in a competitive market. Cost Containment; 1982 Oct; 4(20):3-5. PubMed ID: 10257042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Court amends its opinion in Marshfield Clinic ruling. Jaklevic MC Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(43):24. PubMed ID: 10152104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Trade restraint suit filed against AMA. Med World News; 1983 Aug; 24(15):74. PubMed ID: 10261843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Competition in health insurance markets. Pauly MV Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):237-71. PubMed ID: 10295964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Ball Memorial Hospital: Section 2 Sherman Act analysis in the alternative health care delivery market. Kirsch T Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(2-3):249-79. PubMed ID: 3072878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. U.S. Supreme Court rejects case-by-case antitrust analysis in Maricopa. McCann RW Health Law Vigil; 1982 Jun; 5(13):1-4. PubMed ID: 10256005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Hospital competition and antitrust: the Federal Trade Commission staff report. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jul; 10(14):6-10. PubMed ID: 10282648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. High Court debate: does healthcare deserve special antitrust review? Proger PA Mod Healthc; 1981 Nov; 11(11):120, 122. PubMed ID: 10253232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Must payers deal with their vertically integrated competitors--the Wesley Medical Center decision. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(15):11-4. PubMed ID: 10278408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Provider-sponsored ADSs: reducing antitrust liability after Maricopa. Walsh JH; Feller H Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 Apr; 7(2):5-25. PubMed ID: 10270877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Sounding boards. Competition and health care: a new Trojan horse? Caper P N Engl J Med; 1982 Apr; 306(15):928-9. PubMed ID: 7038495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. States can't shield peer review from antitrust--high court. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 May; 18(21):5. PubMed ID: 10324515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 10292421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Denying hospital privileges to non-physicians: does quality of care justify a potential restraint of trade? Reindl G Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1988 May; 9(11):7-39. PubMed ID: 10286963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]