These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10278339)
1. What competition can do to peer review. Holoweiko M Med Econ; 1985 Aug; 62(17):122-7, 131-9. PubMed ID: 10278339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. High court's override on Patrick renews concerns about peer review risk. Halper HR; Kazon PM Bus Health; 1988 Jul; 5(9):40-1. PubMed ID: 10288490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Courts and Congress shield peer review process from antitrust liability. Halper HR Bus Health; 1987 Jan; 4(3):59. PubMed ID: 10280004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Perspectives. The Patrick case: implications for peer review. Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1988 May; 42(22):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10287491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Antitrust. Is quality review in jeopardy? Pollner F Med World News; 1988 Jun; 29(12):34-6, 38, 43-7. PubMed ID: 10287973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 10292421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Eleventh Circuit allows state action defense in medical staff antitrust case. Miller RD Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Jan; 6(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 10292016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Oregon case raises questions about peer review. Davis CD Healthtexas; 1989 Jan; 44(7):7. PubMed ID: 10313055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review in the wake of Patrick. McCormick B Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Supreme Court decides Patrick; peer review alive and well despite ruling. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(13):1-5. PubMed ID: 10287418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Patrick v Burget. JCAH Perspect; 1986; 6(7-8):7-9. PubMed ID: 10289700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. States can't shield peer review from antitrust--high court. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 May; 18(21):5. PubMed ID: 10324515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patrick v. Burget; will the state action doctrine protect bad faith peer review? Healthspan; 1988 Feb; 5(2):20-2. PubMed ID: 10288650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]